![]() |
||||||||||||||
|
Australia: The Land Where Time Began |
||||||||||||||
|
Chondrichthyan Radiation of the Late Palaeozoic
The placoderms and some other fish groups went extinct by the Early
Carboniferous, and about this time
the chondrichthyans had another burst of rapid radiation in the Early
Carboniferous, possibly to fill empty niches vacated by the large
numbers of fish types that had recently disappeared. Among the many new
groups were the first chimaerids (holocephalans).
Among these new shark forms were many with features that are not seen in
living sharks.
From the Late
Devonian
to the Early
Permian,
there was a very unusual shark, the stethacanthids. These sharks
lived from the Late Devonian to the Permian. On the top of the main
dorsal fin of the males there was bony brush-like structure. The dorsal
brush of Stethacanthus
and
Akmonistion was very
large, and had many denticles that were sharp, but in other sharks of
this type the dorsal brushes varied in size and shape. A very well
preserved specimen of Stethacanthus was found in the
Bearsden deposit near Glasgow by Stan Wood, a fossil collector from
Edinburgh, and is now in the
Hunterian
Museum
at Glasgow University. It was described by Michael Coats and Sandy
Sequoia [Sequeira?] in 2001. The dorsal fin spines of Damocles and
Falcatus were narrow and cylindrical.
Stethacanthid teeth have a main cusp and many small cusps on either side
of it on a broad root. The teeth are commonly found throughout the
Palaeozoic. In North America, Early Carboniferous forms have teeth
up to 7 cm wide, the cusps being almost 4 cm high. Based on the normal
number of tooth rows assumed to be about 12, the estimated size of the
mouth would have been about 1 m wide, and the shark would have been
about 6 m long. At the time these large predators were in the ocean, in
the inland water were
crossopterygian (rhizodontiforms) predators 6-7 m long.
Among other sharks present between the Carboniferous and the Permian was
the ctenacanth group, the genus Ctenacanthus ("comb
spine"). These had many rows of fine nodes on their fin spines, hence
the comb-like appearance. In the Early Carboniferous sites near
Edinburgh are Goodrichichthys and Ctenacanthus,
both less than 50 cm long. Another group that was common from the late
in the Palaeozoic to early in the Mesozoic was the
Xenacanth
sharks.
The teeth of Xenacanths are characteristic, having 2 main cusp and on
the root, a well-developed bone button, the lingual torus. A xenacanth
shark,
Xenacanthus, that was well
known from complete fossils that have been found in deposits dating to
the Permian-Triassic of Western Europe, and from skulls and spines from
the Texas redbeds, that were well preserved, had a large defensive spine
that was serrated protruding from its neck. Unlike the condition in most
sharks, that have a heterocercal tail, the tail was straight. They have
been found predominantly in freshwater deposits. According to Long these
predators invaded the freshwaters by moving into the river systems from
the sea, their teeth being well-known from both marine and freshwater
deposits. In the Somersby fish site, of Triassic age, near Gosford, New
South Wales almost complete remains have been found of xenacanthid
sharks
Among fish, the Edestoid sharks are some of the most bizarre.
Some relatively complete body fossils have been found, showing that they
were streamlined and fast-swimming, e.g., Fadenia. Some,
such as Helicoprion
and Edestus, had complex tooth-whorls that coiled
about on themselves, having a shape like that of a snail shell, as in
the ammonites of the time, and probably hung from the lower jaw in life.
The function of these tooth-whorls is uncertain. There have been a
number of suggestions to explain these bizarre teeth. One suggestion is
that they were used as living sawfish (saw sharks) use their saw,
charging into schools of fish and thrashing their heads from side to
side, tearing the fish to pieces then eating the bits of fish.
Another suggestion is that they mimicked ammonites to attract prey if
the shark used them in a particular way. Long prefers the suggestion
that they were used like a saw shark’s saw.
This was a very successful group, spreading around the world during the
Middle Permian. Helicoprion tooth-whorls have been found
in Russia, North America, Japan and Australia.
Another type of shark, the orodontids, had an elongated body, no spines
and crenulated crushing teeth that were characteristic of the group. The
teeth of
Orodus are common in
Carboniferous deposits around the world.
There was also a group of flattened sharks that were ray-like, the
petalodonts, from the Late
Palaeozoic. Apart from some well-preserved
specimens they are mostly known from their teeth.
A shark found in the Bear Gulch Limestone in Montana,
Belanstea Montana, was a
deep-bodied form that had large pelvic and dorsal fins that were
feathery.
Janassa also had broad,
rounded pectoral fins that were ray-like. They had peculiar teeth that
are strongly compressed, which indicates their prey were invertebrates
with hard shells. Specimens that have articulated dentitions are
present, the shark had only a few teeth in each jaw.
Petalodus had
characteristic teeth that were broad, flat and slicing, and had a collar
of folded enamel at the base.
Typical genera are
Ctenoptychius and
Ageleodus, that have a
flat, broad root with 4-30 small pointed cusps (Downs and Daeschler,
2001).
Megactenopetalus was at
the other extreme that had a single large upper tooth that was
multicuspid, and in the lower jaw a single large shearing tooth, that
together comprised the entire dentition of the animal (Hansen, 1978).
The teeth are largely used to identify most petalodonts.
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
| Author: M.H.Monroe Email: admin@austhrutime.com Sources & Further reading | ||||||||||||||