![]() |
||||||||||||||
|
Australia: The Land Where Time Began |
||||||||||||||
|
Extensive volcanism marked the breakup of the central Atlantic region in
the Early Jurassic, of which the best known are the flood basalts of the
Newark Basin, NE of the US (Olsen et
al., 1997). The original
volume of these extrusives is believed to have been a relatively modest
50,000 km3 (McHone, 1996), though Deckart (Deckart et
al., 1997) was led by the
study of scattered outcrops in French Guyana, Surinam and Guinea to
speculate that a major CFBP may have formed before the rifting of the
central Atlantic. Further support for this hypothesis came from the work
of Marzoli (Marzoli et al.,
1999), who discovered additional flood basalts in northern and central
Brazil that were contemporaneous. It has therefore been proposed that a
Central Atlantic Magmatic Province (Marzoli et
al., 1999), that had
scattered outcrops that are now centripetally located around the
periphery of the central Atlantic region. Estimates of the original area
of the province, that were based on the assumption that a continuous
entity was formed by the flood basalts, range up to 7 x 106
km2, and a volume of at least 2 x 106
km 3 (Marzoli et
al., 1999).
The province may have originally been one of the largest
of its kind if this is the case (Olsen, 1999).
The dates for the Central Atlantic Magmatic Province that are best
constrained are found in the Newark Basin, where the onset of volcanism
began at 201 ± 1 Ma is suggested by several U-Pb ages (Dunning & Hodych,
1990; Weems & Olsen, 1997) and lasted only 580 ± 100 ka (Olsen et
al., 1997). In the
southeastern USA extensive dykes have yielded 40Ar-39Ar
ages, which have external errors of 199.5 ± 2.0 Ma (Hames et
al., 2000). It is suggested
by lavas and intrusives of South America that are well-dated with U-Pb
ages ranging from 204 to 197 Ma (Marzoli et
al., 1999). The eruptions are
placed by the most precise dates within the Hettangian Stage of the
basal Jurassic and this is confirmed, in the Newark Basin, by the
presence of the lowest lava 30 m above the base of the palynologically
defined Triassic-Jurassic (T-J) boundary ( Fowell & Olsen, 1993.
The loss of 60% of palynospecies at this boundary, as well as with a
proliferation of fern spores, suggest there was a sudden and severe
crisis in the terrestrial flora at the boundary. An even more severe
loss, >95% of species extinction, has been reported for leaf species in
northern Europe (McElwain et al.,
1999). This floral extinction has however, not yet been recognised
beyond the North Atlantic region (Hallam & Wignall, 1997).
The close, though not perfect, temporal link between the onset of flood
basalt eruptions and a terrestrial crisis has led most workers to infer
that there is a cause and effect relationship (Rampino & Struthers,
1988; Courtillot et al.,
1999; Pálfy et al., 2000).
Most of the climatic changes have been reported from the T-J boundary
interval. Therefore, an analysis (McElwain et
al., 1999) of the stomatal
density in fossil leaves from east Greenland and the Baltic suggests
there was a major increase in atmospheric CO2 in the basal
Jurassic which Wignall suggests may be attributable to central Atlantic
volcanism.
High precision U-Pb dating of an ash layer from a marine boundary
section in the Queen Charlotte Islands, Canada, where a date of 199.6 ±
0.3 Ma was obtained from a level that was 5 m from the top of the
highest radiolarian zone of the Triassic, provided further data on the
mass extinction event at the J-T boundary. According to Wignall this
date appears to be somewhat younger than the terrestrial T-J boundary in
the Newark Basin, which led to the suggestion (Pálfy et
al., 2000) that marine
extinctions may have post-dated the terrestrial by approximately 700 ka.
The precise dating of the mass extinction event in marine sections at
the end of the Triassic, however, is not well established (Hallam &
Wignall, 1997). Amongst the most prominent victims of this crises were
the bivalves and ammonoids, and it is suggested by their record that
there was a gradual decline in the Rheatian Stage of the latest
Triassic, which may be partially due to changes in local facies, with a
final coup-de-grace somewhat below the T-J boundary (e.g. Hallam &
Wignall, 2000). The latest Rheatian marine extinction probably coincides
with the floral crisis of the end-Rheatian, if the marine T-J boundary
is indeed marginally younger than the terrestrial boundary.
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
| Author: M.H.Monroe Email: admin@austhrutime.com Sources & Further reading | ||||||||||||||