![]() |
||||||||||||||
|
Australia: The Land Where Time Began |
||||||||||||||
|
Mitochondrial Control Region Sequence Variation in Australian
Aboriginals
The
mitochondrial D-loop hypervariable segment 1 (mtHVS1) between
nucleotides 15997 and 16377 has been examined in Australian Aboriginal
people from the Darling River region in New South Wales (riverine) and
from Yuendumu, central Australia, which is a desert area. There were 47
unique HVS1 types were identified, which varied at 49 nucleotide
positions. Statistically significant structure in the populations is
revealed by Pairwise analysis by calculation of BEPPI (between
population proportion index), though there are some identical HVS1 types
that are present in the 2 contrasting regions. More ancient
distributions may be reflected in mt HVS1 types than are reflected by
linguistic diversity and other attributes that are culturally
distinguishable. It is revealed by comparisons with sequences from 5
published global studies that these Australian Aboriginal people
demonstrate the greatest divergence from some African people and least
from highland people from PNG (Papua New Guinea), and only slightly more
from some Pacific groups
(Indonesian, Asian, Samoan, and coastal PNG). It is suggested by the
construction of a median network, which displays 3 main groups, that
several hypervariable nucleotide sequences within the HVS1 are likely to
have undergone mutation independently, which makes phylogenetic
comparison with global samples difficult by conventional methods. In
median networks that are constructed from Australian Aboriginal HVS1
types alone and for 1 global selection, specific nucleotide-site
variants are major separators. It is suggested by the distribution of
these, which require extended study, that they may be signatures of
different groups of colonisers into Australia in prehistoric times, for
which the time of colonisation has remained elusive.
·
The mitochondrial genome, which is valuable in the study of
interspecific as well as intraspecific evolution, as a result of its
mode of inheritance, which is mostly through the maternal line (Giles et
al., 1980; Hausworth &
Laipis, 1982,
·
Absence of recombination, and rapid rate of evolution (Brown et
al., 1979),
·
Has been the molecule of choice in many studies of humans throughout the
world (e.g. Cann & Wilson, 1983; Cann et
al., 1987; Vigilant et
al., 1989, 1991; Schurr et
al., 1990; Di Rienzo &
Wilson, 1991; Ward et al.,
1991, 1993; Torroni et al.,
1992, 1993a, 1993b; Lum et al.,
1994; Redd et al., 1995;
Soodyall et al., 1996).
An analysis of RLFPs (Cann et al.,
1987) gave rise to the suggestion that all modern mitochondrial types
have spread from an African source that existed about 200,000 BP.
Subsequent studies have not refuted the model, and mtDNA remains in use
as a powerful tool for the examination of recent population history,
though it has led to contentious debate among researchers, in particular
with regard to estimations of rates of mutation and interpretation of
phylogenetic analytical methods. In many places such as Australia and
America, where indigenous groups have been dispossessed by colonisers,
in many communities social history has resulted in maternal ancestry
being maintained while paternal lineages are mixed, and this is an added
advantage of mtDNA studies, instead of nuclear DNA. nDNA studies have
limited value in these cases, while mtDNA studies can provide
information about maternal connections that are sometimes lost with the
breakup of traditional groups.
Not many Australian mtDNA studies have been published (Cann et
al., 1987; Griziotis et
al., 1987; Hertzberg et
al., 1989; Stoneking &
Wilson, 1989; Lum et al.,
1994; Betty et al., 1996),
none of which described diversity within the continent. As a result of
this the use of published data in global comparisons contributed little
information before now. Diversification within the continent has not
been described by any mtDNA studies.
Australia has been inhabited by humans for at least 50,000 years
(Roberts et al., 1990), and
possibly very much longer. It is demonstrated by archaeological evidence
that has been radiocarbon dated that
Homo sapiens was present
in Australia by 30,000 BP, at several sites throughout the continent
that have been well documented. Tasmania is included among these sites,
which has been isolated from the mainland since about 10,000 BP and is
one of the extreme regions of human expansion (reviewed in Smith et
al., 1993; Flood 1995, pp.
15-221).
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
| Author: M.H.Monroe Email: admin@austhrutime.com Sources & Further reading | ||||||||||||||