![]() |
||||||||||||||
|
Australia: The Land Where Time Began |
||||||||||||||
|
Australian Aboriginal People - Prehistoric Assisted Migration of a
Rainforest Tree
The dispersal of many plants that are culturally important has been
contributed to by human activities. The way the natural distribution and
dynamics of species and communities are perceived can be altered by the
study of these traditional interactions. The way in which native
populations influenced their distribution is revealed by comprehensive
evolutionary and anthropological data. Empirical evidence for the
deliberate dispersal of native crops by prehistoric peoples remains
limited, though also included in traditional diets were a suite of
plants that were not cultivated, and which necessitated in some places
the development of culturally important technical advances such as the
treatment of toxic seeds. In this study Rossetto et al. integrated
historic and biocultural research that involved Aboriginal people, with
chloroplast and nuclear genomic data to demonstrate Aboriginal-mediated
dispersal of a non-cultivated rainforest tree.
Rossetto et al. assembled new anthropological evidence of the use and
deliberate dispersal of
Castanospermum australe (Fabaceae),
a non-cultivated riparian tree that produces toxic, though highly
nutritious, seeds that are distributed by water, that are culturally
significant. Rossetto et
al. validated cultural
evidence of recent dispersal that was mediated by humans by revealing
genomic homogeneity across habitat that was extensively dissected,
multiple catchments and uneven topography in the southern range of this
species. They excluded the potential contribution of other dispersal
mechanisms based on the absence of suitable vectors and current
distributional patterns at higher elevations and not near watercourses,
as well as comparing a comparative sample from northern Australia.
Previous studies of the influence of prehistoric humans on the
Australian vegetation have centred primarily around broad-scale change
that was associated with the practice and cessation of burning by
Aboriginals (Bowman, 1998; Ens, Walsh & Clarke, 2017) and the
accumulative effects that have been hypothesised of human–induced
decline of megafauna (Miller et al., 2005). The role of humans within a
broader context has been considered to have been an integral factor in
the geographical spread of crops and agriculture. It is suggested by
evidence that has been obtained from Amazonian forests that
pre-Columbian dispersal of domesticated plants had an unforeseen role of
the way in which species are distributed in rainforest assemblages of
the present (Shepard & Ramirez, 2011; Thomas et al., 2015; Levis et al.,
2017). Evolutionary studies based on DNA that have been carried out in
the Pacific region have documented the link between long distance
dispersal of seed by Indigenous people and the current distribution of
native crops (Zerega et al., 2004; Clarke & Burtenshaw, 2006; Roullier &
Benoit, 2013). Investigators have been able to investigate the
prehistoric human settlement of the Pacific through evolutionary history
of traditional domestication by integrating genetics, linguistics and
archaeobotany (Perrier & Langhe, 2011). In regards to the dispersal of
non-cultivated plants by prehistoric Indigenous peoples evidence has
remained limited, however, to ecological and archaeological
circumstantial evidence (Perrier & Langhe, 2011; Atchison, 2009). There
is now the potential to innovate in the field as the result of the new
technological advances and the integration of multi-disciplinary data
sources.
The influence in Australia of assisted migration or human dispersal is
now included in lists of possible explanations for the genetic patterns
in landscapes that have been detected for
Livistona mariae in
central Australia (Kondo, 2012) and
Adansonia gregorii in the
Kimberley region (Bell et al., 2014). The corroboration of dispersal
hypotheses that is human-mediated and the exclusion of alternative
mechanisms require that further ethnographic and cultural research be
linked directly to the interpretations that have been derived from
genetic patterns. A follow-up study on
A. gregorii, for
instance, identified overlap between genetic connectivity at population
level and regional linguistic variation (Rangan et al., 2015), and local
traditional beliefs of Indigenous dispersal where reported with
historical accounts that are related to current distribution of
L. mariae (Bowman, 2015).
These interpretative frameworks lack, however, corroboration from other
sources and ethnographic information derived from Indigenous
collaborators. The study by Rossetto et
al. integrated from the start
the onset, anthropological, molecular and ecological research to test if
dispersal by Aboriginal people can explain the distribution of a
variable, though non-cultivated resource tree,
Castanospermum australe
A. Cunn. Ex Mudie (black bean, Fabaceae). Hydrochory (water-dispersal)
is the usual method of migration of
Castanospermum, instead
of ingestion and deposition in faeces that is used by many other species
of tree to migrate (Smith et al., 1990). The seed pods of
C. australe are large and
buoyant, and the germination of the seed is not affected by seawater
(Smith et al., 1990), and so neither the seeds nor pods provide rewards
for dispersal. The reliance on water of
C. australe for dispersal
is reflected in the distribution of this tree along riparian habitats
close to the coast (Swanborough, 1998). However there are multiple
populations located among rainforest vegetation inland from the coast
and at considerable elevation, which implies dispersal by alternative
means.
Australian Aboriginal people have traditionally used the seeds, which
are highly nutritious, as a staple food source (Birtles, 1997; Dixon,
1983) following extensive treatment to neutralise the toxins (Birtles,
1997; Dixon, 1983). The seeds ripen in May-June, and these were often
stored underground for several months (Coyyan, 1018; Mjöberg, 1918).
Also, when the ground meal of
C. australe was prepared
it could be stored for later use (Maiden, 1899). It had previously been
identified that there were strong links between the application of
techniques for detoxifying the seeds and the more intensive habitation
of rainforests in northern Queensland between 2,500 BP and 1,000 BP
(Cosgrave, field & Ferrier, 2007; Ferrier & Cosgrove, 2012), though the
dispersal by Aboriginal people had not been investigated previously. In
this study Rossetto et al.
used an integrative framework that was exclusion-based to show that the
prehistoric dispersal by Aboriginal people explains the distribution at
the present of
C. australe within
northern New South Wales (NNSW). They focused their attention on this
geographically well-defined area because of the paucity of local fauna
that could disperse the seeds (an absence of megafauna [Rossetto et al.,
2015]), their understanding of local rainforest dynamic and
biogeographic processes (Rossetto et al., 2015; Kooyman et
al., 2011), and because
dispersal by Aboriginal people had been proposed as a speculative
explanation for the inland distribution of the species in NNSW (Maiden,
1899).
In order to determine if deliberate dispersal by local Aboriginal People
influenced the contemporary patterns of distribution of
C. australe they aimed
to:
1.
reveal prehistoric, historic, linguistic and ethnographic cultural
evidence of use and deliberate dispersal;
2.
analyse chloroplast and nuclear (ribosomal) genetic data to detect the
genetic signature of recent, rapid expansion within NNSW;
3.
exclude alternative explanatory scenarios through the integration of
complementary sources of evidence, and by comparing the findings from
NNSW to a representative sample from the Australian Wet Tropics (AWT),
where ecological (Rossetto et al., 2015) and prehistoric cultural
circumstances differ (Cosgrove, Field & Ferrier, 2007; Ferrier &
Cosgrove, 2012).
Results and discussion
Anthropological evidence for the use and dispersal of black bean seeds
Anthropological evidence was revealed by Rossetto et
al. for prehistoric dispersal
by Aboriginal people by verifying that Aboriginal people used the
species; and several sources that included Songlines (Dreaming tracks)
that describe deliberate movement of this species by Aboriginal people.
Linguistic evidence could neither support nor negate the hypothesis of
human dispersal and lateral languages transfer.
This study found many historical records from the colonial period
(Maiden, 1899; Ferrier & Cosgrove, 2012) that described detoxification
and food preparation methods of
C. australe seeds by
Aboriginal people in NNSW. There are also many ethnographic records that
describe other uses of
C. australe by Aboriginal
people from the AWT (Birtles, 1997; Dixon, 1983; Coyyan, 1918)
including:
·
The use of bark fibre for fish and animal traps, nets and baskets;
·
wood for spear throwers;
·
seed pods as toy boats; and
·
as a seasonal cue for jungle fowl hunting.
The study corroborated the usefulness of black bean as a food resource
through ethnographic interviews with 5 NNSW Aboriginal knowledge
custodians in 2016 (S1 and S2 Appendices).
It has been revealed by mtDNA studies that Aboriginal people have
inhabited Australia in consistent geographic arrangements for up to
50,000 [Recent dating 65,000 years (Tobler et al., 2017) see
Australian Occupation of Northern Australia by Humans 65,000 years ago].
The strong connection to country by local Aboriginal communities, who,
over time, maintained knowledge via oral transmissions, was facilitated
by continuous regional persistence. Physical pathways are associated
with traditional Aboriginal Songlines (Dreaming stories/tracks) that
were traversed by Aboriginal people and for which specific songs and
stories were told to pass on and maintain knowledge.
Rossetto et al. recovered 3
Dreaming stories that relayed the movement, maintenance and sign
significance of
C. australe in NNSW (S1
Appendix), of which the Nguthungulli Songline told by Ngarakbal woman
Charlotte Brown and recorded by Roland Robinson in the 1950s (Robinson,
1989) is the most pertinent. According to this story Nguthungulli (an
ancestral spirit that likely represents a real person) carried and left
“bean tree” (C.
australe is the only local species being commonly referred to as
“bean tree”) seeds as he journeyed inland from the east coast to the
western Ranges (S1 Appendix point 1.2). In this study, the Songline was
traced for the first time on a topographic map by a local Aboriginal
man, Oliver Costello, and traditional pathway expert, Ian Fox). They
believe, based on their intimate cultural and migration knowledge of the
region, that like many Aboriginal pathways which followed points of high
elevation for ease of access and vision, the Nguthungulli Songline
traverses the ridges of the Nightcap, Border and McPherson ranges which
divide New south Wales from Queensland. The relevance of this pathway is
that the ridges of the Nightcap ranges coincide with the top of the
drainage basin for the Tweed River, and the southern face of the Border
and McPherson ranges coincide with the top of the drainage basins for
the Richmond and Clarence Rivers. The sampling sites of this study for
the genomic analyses are represented by these catchments. From the
perspective of Aboriginal knowledge, these stories confirm that
Aboriginal people used black bean seeds as food in prehistoric times and
moved them around the landscape deliberately, including along ridgelines
of NNSW.
Vertical inheritance, language-internal replacements, sound mutations
that accumulate slowly, shifts in meanings, or lateral transfer, shape
histories of individual words. The geographic range of
C. australe coincides
with Pama-Nyungan language family (Bowen & Atkinson, 2012). Rossetto et
al. identified linguistic
terms for
C. australe in 8
linguistic subgroups of the eastern clade of the Pama-Nyungan language
family (S3 Appendix).
Included within the Bandjalangic clade are the languages of NNSW, and
the most common ancestors (MMCA) of which is likely to be close to 1,500
years old (C. Bowens pers,
comm.). Common inheritance from the MRCA results in Bandjalangic
vocabulary being inherited with only a few sound changes (45), and the
word for
C. australe is uniformly
bugam. This contrasts with the rest of the distribution of
C. australe where little
homology is exhibited by the terms, even within members of the same
low-level clade such as the Djirbalic languages from the (AWT) (S3
Appendix).
Positive diagnosis of inheritance with modifications by the absence of
mutation of any of the phonemes in bugam, though it is also in line with
a scenario of locally recent dispersal of black bean. It is suggested by
the divergence with words for
C. australe from both
neighbouring and more distant language clades, that lateral transfer of
bugam into post-MRCA Bandjalangic from external sources is not probable.
Therefore, while alternatives are possible it is most likely that as the
Bandjalangic languages expanded into their current territory, or
diversified in situ, they
inherited bugam continuously from their MRCA.
Genomic evidence of rapid, recent and widespread expansion from their
MRCA
It was confirmed by the combination of ethnographic data and first-hand
corroboration by Aboriginal custodians of traditional knowledge from
NNSW that
C. australe was a
valuable local traditional resource plant and was likely to have been
moved intentionally by Aboriginal people across the focus area of the
study. The distribution of this tree within the framework of dispersal
by Aboriginal people was interpreted further by sampling the local
genomic variation.
Rossetto et al. used genomic
analyses to search for a signature of the rapid local expansion expected
from the human-mediated timeline that was set by archaeological evidence
by the use of techniques to detoxify the seeds (Cosgrove, field &
Ferrier, 2007). The detection of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)
from low-coverage genomic sequencing can reveal small amounts of
variation within- and between-population variation that enables the
exploration of fine-scale patterns of dispersal even in non-model
species with low diversity (McPherson et al., 2013; Rossetto et al.,
2015).
This study analysed a total of 1224,678bp of chloroplast DNA (cpDNA) and
5,813bp of nuclear ribosomal DNA (nrDNA) and compared the results with
C. australe sites,
comprising 8 individuals each, catchments and regions. 987 cpDNA SNPs
(0.749% of sequence analysed) and 29 nrDNA SNPs (0.50% of sequence
analysed), were yielded by analyses of sequence data across 96
individual trees from 12 distinct sites. Between 4 and 12 heterozygotic
variants across 5,813bp, which confirmed a pattern of low diversity
within the population.
In species that are dispersed by water, the results of landscape
restraints can be local patterns of localised relatedness and population
level cpDNA uniformity that is observed across the distribution of
C. australe (Kondo,
Nakagoshi & Isagi, 2009). In NNSW, however, genomic homogeneity extended
across entire catchments, with every site sampled from within each
catchment belonging to the same lineage, regardless of geographic
distances and topography. A single, unique, fixed SNP was found in the
Big Scrub site within the catchment of the Richmond River. Conditions of
the landscape need to be favourable for long-distance and directed
dispersal of seeds along water bodies for Hydrochory to generate
patterns of cpDNA within catchments (Nilsson et al., 2010). The
altitudinal heterogeneity and geographic scale that is typical of the
southern distribution of
C. australe is, however,
not likely to favour rapid inland expansion that is mediated by water.
Spatial aggregation of individuals that are genetically related can also
be reduced by Hydrochory with the result that high levels of genetic
divergence between catchments (Nilsson et al., 2010; Kondo, Nakagoshi &
Isagi, 2009). Though the samples from the northern AWT distribution of
C. australe fit the
pattern that is expected of high differentiation between catchments, the
sites in NNSW do not. In the north high diversity was detected, where
there were considerably more unique SNPs across 3 AWT sites (509 in
cpDNA, and 3 in nrDNA) than across 9 NNSW sites (6 in cpDNA, and none in
nrDNA. In NNSW, genomic homogeneity extended across 3 catchments
covering a large area (30,604 km2) that was topographically
complex, from sea level to an elevation of 1,166 m, across multiple
ranges that are dissected, crossing the Clarence River Corridor into the
Orara catchment, which was an important biogeographic barrier that can
restrict genetic connectivity even in species that are easily dispersed
(Rossetto et al., 2015).
It is implied by this that, unlike the comparative sample from the AWT,
that exhibits a high level of diversity among 3 adjacent catchments that
cover a smaller area, 6,550 km2; from sea level to an
altitude of 783 m; all NNSW populations that have been sampled are
derived from recent dispersal events that were sourced from 1 or a very
small number of maternal lineages that were closely related. Rapid
expansion within the southern range of the species is further supported
by the non-accrual of unique, catchment-specific nrDNA variation, as it
is expected from ancient processes, that there would be accumulation of
detectable distinctive mutations (Ossowski et al., 2010). These findings
match the expectations of population genetics from the recent Aboriginal
dispersal scenario that is suggested by anthropological, cultural and
linguistic evidence.
Exclusion of alternative rapid, southern expansion scenarios
According to Rossetto et al.
when their findings are combined with recent Aboriginal dispersal as the
most parsimonious explanation for the current distribution in NNSW,
though there are other interpretations that could be proposed for some
aspects of the data that is presented. Recent, rapid population
expansions have also been observed in natural post-glacial settings
(Hewitt, 2000), are suggested by landscape genetics patterns.
C. australe would have
been restricted to a small refugial population within NNSW during the
Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) in a natural post glacial expansion, and a
single founder lineage would have expanded rapidly to its current
distribution as habitat became increasingly available. It is suggested
by environmental niche models that represent the availability of
climatic conditions suitable for
C. australe during the
LGM that there is likely to have been an increase in habitat that is
available in the current interglacial period, and the environmental
suitability in the south remains marginal compared to the north. The
increase in suitable habitat that was modelled fits with the proposed
recent dispersal that was mediated by humans, following the pursuit of
resources that were newly available (Cosgrove, Field & Ferrier, 2007),
and the scenario of natural expansion that was also proposed for other
local trees (McPherson et al., 2013; Rossetto et al., 2004). The latter
processes, however, invariably rely on dispersal mechanisms that are
efficient and that are not available to
C. australe in NNSW.
The contribution of rapid, recent geographic expansion, which was
mediated by water, along coastal areas and along waterways that were low
lying (potentially even derived from a northern source) cannot be
excluded. Oceanic currents, tidal processes, extreme weather events or
the capture of rivers cannot, however, explain the location of multiple
inland sites, as well as above current and historical sea level (Helman
et al., 2010). Secondary movement of species that are water-dispersed
inland away from the riparian zone, to upland areas, or between
catchments is often performed by animals (Nilsson et al., 2010).
Within Australian rainforests the movement of species that have large
seeds is restricted by the limited number of functional classes of fauna
that disperse fruit irrespective of the availability of habitat (Rossetto
et al., 2015). As a consequence the distribution and assembly of
Australian rainforest plants is impacted by the type and size of fruit.
Significantly larger geographical ranges are occupied by species that
produce small, palatable fleshy fruits than species that produce fruits
that are poorly dispersible, and landscapes that are recolonised lack
the component of the flora that produce large fruit (Rossetto et al.,
2015). A zoochory (animal dispersal) hypothesis for the current
distribution of
C. australe is therefore
at odds with the large, toxic seeds that have no reward for the fauna to
disperse them. Even within
the AWT, where the highest diversity of frugivorous animals persists,
which includes the cassowary, the remaining representative of the
rainforest megafauna, the high genetic diversion that has been measured
between neighbouring catchments suggests that zoochory does not play a
critical role in maintaining a connectivity among populations of
C. australe. An
alternative scenario that involves the potential contribution of
megafauna that are now extinct is also doubtful, as the timeframes that
are involved in the loss of large rainforest vertebrates are too
extended (Johnson, 2006) to justify the genomic homogeneity that has
been detected in NNSW.
Conclusions
The new combined evidence that is presented supports deliberate
dispersal by prehistoric Aboriginal People as this is the interpretation
that is the most parsimonious for the distribution of the species in
NNSW. It has been suggested (Furrier & Cosgrove, 2012) that in the AWT,
the expansion of aboriginal dwellers in rainforest during the Late
Holocene, 2,500-1,000 BP, could have been facilitated by the development
of techniques for the detoxifying rainforest nuts such as
C. australe, which became
critical technologies that aided survival in areas where these resources
were available. It was demonstrated by Rossetto et
al. that the inverse was also
true: Food preparation technologies were developed by local Aboriginal
communities that had a deliberate impact on the distribution of
culturally important rainforest species. Aboriginal influence on the
distribution and assembly of species was largely ignored by early
European colonists in Australia, apart from obvious fire-related
impacts. The studies of Rossetto et
al., as well as those of
other researchers, can help to expand cultural heritage management
practices by promoting the need to maintain living biotic heritage, in
this case, groves of
C. australe in
collaboration with Aboriginal custodians of knowledge.
Evidence of dispersal of plant propagules by prehistoric Australian
Aboriginal people for their direct need and benefit also significantly
challenges assumptions of “natural” distributions of plants, requires
reassessment of distribution interpretations that do not include the
possible impact of prehistoric intervention by humans (Levis, 2017).
Rossetto et al. suggest that
current debates on the role of migration that was human assisted (Corlett,
2016) and other active management options could also benefit from the
acceptance, from practitioners of conservation as well as the general
public, that in the past species were deliberately dispersed by
Aboriginal people. As current measures of the success are often based on
historical (pre-European) reference systems, this is particularly
relevant.
Now that the role of Aboriginal dispersal has been established
regionally for
C. australe, studies in
the future can explore the broader biogeographic questions, such as
possible routes along eastern Australia and across the pacific islands.
Aboriginal knowledge custodian Uncle Ron Heron proposed independently a
scenario of long-distance dispersal by ancestors from the north. (S1
Appendix, point 1.7).
Rossetto, M., et al. (2017). "From Songlines to Genomes: Prehistoric
Assisted Migration of a Rain Forest Tree by Australian Aboriginal
People." PLoS ONE 12: e0186663.
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
| Author: M.H.Monroe Email: admin@austhrutime.com Sources & Further reading | ||||||||||||||