Australia: The Land Where Time Began |
||||||||||||||
Defoliation of Interior Douglas-fir Elicits Carbon Transfer and Stress
Signalling to Neighbouring Ponderosa Pine Trough Ectomycorrhizal
Networks
According to Song et al.
extensive regions of Interior Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga
menziesii var. glauca, IDF) forests in North America are being
damaged by drought and western spruce budworm (Choristoneura
occidentalis). Warmer, drier summers associated with climate
change are causing this damage. In order to test whether defoliated IDF
can transfer directly resources to ponderosa pine (Pinus
ponderosae) that is regenerating nearby, thereby aiding in the
recovery of the forest, Song et
al., examined the transfer of photosynthetic carbon and defence
enzyme response. They grew pairs of ectomycorrhizal IDF ‘donor’ and
ponderosa pine ‘receiver’ seedlings in pots and isolated pathways by
comparing 35 μm, 0.5 μm and no mesh treatments; they then stressed IDF
donors either through manual defoliation or infestation by budworm. The
found that manual defoliation of IDF donors led to transfer of carbon to
neighbouring receivers via mycorrhizal networks, though not trough soil
or root pathways. Both manual and insect defoliation of donors led to
increased activity of peroxidase, polyphenol oxidase and superoxide
dismutase in the ponderosa pine receivers, by a mechanism that was
dependent primarily on the mycorrhizal network. It is indicated by these
findings that IDF can transfer these resources and stress signals to
interspecific neighbours, which suggests that mycorrhizal networks can
serve as agents of interspecific communication which facilitates
recovery and succession of forests after disturbances.
According to Song et al.
plants have evolved the ability to communicate with neighbouring plants
for alleviating stresses within communities by the transmission of
volatile compounds aboveground, or a variety of organic and inorganic
compounds belowground. Mycorrhizal networks, which are comprised of
mycorrhizal fungi that connect the roots of multiple plants, are
potentially direct pathways for belowground transference of biochemical
messages between plants (Van der Heijden & Horton, 2009). Evidence is
increasing that mycorrhizal networks can transmit, e.g., herbivore- or
pathogen-induced signalling compounds to warn neighbours of infestations
by pests (Song et al., 2010;
Song et al., 2014; Babikova
et al., 2013), kin
recognition signalling compounds that involve micronutrients to
communicate genetic relationships of neighbours (File, Murphy & Dudley,
2012; Asay., 2013), toxins such as allelochemicals to convey negative
interactions to competing neighbours (Barto et
al., 2011), and essential
resources, such as carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus or water for altering
physiology, survival, or growth of conspecific or heterospecific
neighbours (Simard et al.,
2012). It has also been shown that mycorrhizal networks transfer
phosphorus and nitrogen from dying plants to healthy conspecific
neighbours (Eason, Newman & Chuba, 1991), thereby providing a conduit
for legacy transference across generations. Clipping has similarly
prompted transference of labile carbon from stressed to healthy
heterospecific neighbours through arbuscular mycorrhizal networks
(Fitter et al., 1998). The
neighbours that receive messages could potentially then modify their
behaviour through altered morphology, physiology or biochemistry,
thereby reducing their stress and improving their fitness. The majority
of studies that have been conducted so far have focused on herbaceous or
grass species that form arbuscular mycorrhizal networks, though there is
increasing evidence for interplant communication through mycorrhizal
networks. Commutation belowground between trees linked by
ectomycorrhizal networks in forests has, however received little
attention.
Around the world forests are experiencing increasing stress and tree
mortality as climate changes (van Mantgem, 2009; Allen et
al., 2010). Climate change is
disrupting coevolved host-pest interactions by altering life cycles of
forest trees, insects, and fungal pathogens, which causes outbreaks of
bark beetles that are well documented, in pine (Pinus)
blights and rusts and spruce (Picea)
species in North America (Kurz et
al., 2008; Heineman et al.,
2010; Wood et al., 2010;
Sturrock et al., 2011).
Extensive regions of interior Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga
menziesii (Mirb.) Franco var. glauca (Mayr)) forests are also
being defoliated by drought, western spruce budworm (Choristoneura
occidentalis) and Douglas-fir tussock moth (Orgyia
Pseudotsugata) in a direct response to warmer summer
temperatures (Woods et al.,
2010). Tree mortality that results in sustained severe defoliation makes
new growing space available for tree species from warmer locations and
helps to facilitate predicted forest vegetation shifts (Wang et
al., 2012). These shifts in
forest vegetation are facilitated further by salvage logging of trees
that are dead and dying (Kurz et
al., 2008). Mortality and salvage logging of dry interior
Douglas-fir in interior British Columbia that results from climate
change should make favourable conditions for upwards and northern
migration of Ponderosa pine (Pinus
ponderosa Douglas ex C. Lawson), as predicted by the climate
envelope models of Wang et al.,
(2017).
In North and South America Douglas-fir and ponderosa pine, in a
replacement series experiment, are host to hundreds of species of
ectomycorrhizal fungi, which include many ‘generalist’ fungi that are
common to both tree species (Barroetaveña, Cázares
& Rajchenberg, 2007) and they can thereby be linked to a mycorrhizal
network where the 2 tree species co-occur in nature (Perry et
al., 1989; Molina, Massicotte
& Trappe, 1992). Douglas-fir and ponderosa pine yielded greater biomass
in co-culture than in monoculture when colonised by
Laccaria laccata (Scop.
Ex Fr.) Bk & Br., where foliar nitrogen and phosphorus that are enhanced
transfer through a mycorrhizal network (Perry et
al., 1989). It is suggested
by these results that interplant transfer of nutrients that are mediated
by mycorrhizal network has the potential to influence the distribution
of resources and performance of plants within the communities (Selosse
et al., 2006; He et
al., 2009; Teste et
al., 2009). The possibility
that mycorrhizal networks can act as a conduit for the transfer of
nutrient legacies or stress signals from interior Douglas-fir to healthy
ponderosa pine neighbours in response to climate-induced defoliator
outbreaks, is also opened by this discovery.
Trees can respond to infection by producing an array of defence
compounds that mediate their interactions with the invader (Hare, 2011),
as they have coevolved with native insects and pathogens. Trees also
coevolved with ectomycorrhizal fungi that are responsible for uptake of
nutrients and water in exchange for carbon (Molina, Massicotte & Trappe,
1992). It was also shown by previous research with arbuscular
mycorrhizal tomatoes that when plants are connected by a mycorrhizal
network, stress signals can transfer from infected plants to conspecific
neighbours through this network, thereby increasing activity of defence
compounds, which induce defence-related genes, activating the jasmonate
pathway, and increasing the resistance to pests in receiver plants (Song
et al., 2010; Song et
al., 2014). Additionally,
Song et al. have shown in
other previous studies that interior Douglas-fir can transfer carbon,
nitrogen and water through ectomycorrhizal networks to conspecific or
heterospecific neighbours, and that this has been associated with
increase survival, growth and foliar nutrition of recipient neighbours
(Teste et al., 2009; Simard
Climate change is disrupting 1997; Philip, Simard & Jones, 2010; Bingham
& Simard, 2012). It is suggested that, taken together, transfer of
signals and resources transfer from interior Douglas-fir to ponderosa
pine through ectomycorrhizal networks could play a role in the
facilitating and shaping of the predicted forest vegetation shifts in
this region as climate changes.
The objective of this study was to determine whether when interior
Douglas-fir are injured by being defoliated by insects or manual
defoliation would induce the interspecific transfer of carbon and stress
signals to neighbouring healthy Ponderosa pine seedlings through a
mycorrhizal network. The first hypothesis of Song et
al. was that manual and
insect defoliation would cause the export of labile carbon from interior
Douglas-fir directly to neighbouring Ponderosa pine through mycorrhizal
networks. The expectation was that increasing levels of carbon export
with increasing degree of injury. They also expected that the amount of
transfer would be reduced by the presence of root competition. Their
second hypothesis was that manual and insect defoliation would cause
interior Douglas-fir to communicate via organic stress signals with
ponderosa pine to increase the defence response. They expected that
there would be greater defence response with insect defoliation than
with manual defoliation because the trees had coevolved with the insects
species. They also expected that there would be greater transfer of the
stress signal directly through mycorrhizal networks than indirectly
through soil pathways.
Discussion
Belowground communication with and transfer of legacies from damaged
trees to other encroaching tree species may facilitate forest vegetation
shifts with climate change. This study demonstrated for the first time
that injury to 1 tree species induces substantial belowground transfer
of photosynthetic carbon and elicits a rapid defence response of a
different tree species, probably through the transfer of stress signals.
Moreover, this interspecies communication occurs through mycorrhizal
networks, bypassing microbial transformations that can occur along soil
pathways. The ectomycorrhizal network of the 4-month old interior
Douglas-fir and ponderosa pine was comprised of a single taxon
Wilcoxina rehmii
(Ascomycota, Pezizales order), an E-strain fungal species (Eggen1996)
that is well known as an early coloniser of interior Douglas-fir and
ponderosa pine seedlings in forest soils that have been disturbed
recently (Egger, 1996; Fujimura et
al., 2005; Barker et
al., 2013).
C transfer and partitioning
The first hypothesis of Song et
al. is partially supported by the manual defoliation, though not the
defoliation by insects, caused the interior Douglas-fir to transfer
labile carbon directly to neighbouring ponderosa pine through
mycorrhizal networks. The lack of response to insect treatment may be
explained by the unexpected minimal levels of defoliation by western
spruce budworm compared with the response to manual excision, as was
evidenced by donor isotope contents in the 35 μm mesh treatment, most
likely that the 2 insects were too few or immature at the 3rd
instar stage for vigorous feeding. The study also found that the
transfer of carbon to the shoots and roots of ponderosa pine increased
with the declining donor Douglas-fir isotope content which suggests that
increasing defoliation (which caused lowered isotope uptake)
stimulated the belowground flush to networked pine. When the interior
Douglas-fir were defoliated manually carbon compounds were exported to
roots, a behavioural strategy that is known for helping trees survive
subsequent defoliations (Vanderklein & Reich, 1999). The belowground
pulses of labile carbon to roots were then transported to extrametrical
mycorrhizal network, as indicated by the significant transfer of carbon
to the ponderosa pine receivers. Together, the difference in severity
between the 2 methods of defoliation and the negative relationship
between donor and receiver isotope content, supported the 2nd
expectation of Song et al.
that the export of carbon would increase with defoliation injury. They
predict that severe sustained insect defoliation would elicit that
transfer of carbon of similar magnitude as manual defoliation that was
found in this study, though insect treatment was not enough to elicit a
response, but future research is still needed in order to quantify these
effects in the greenhouse and in
situ.
Carbon transfer belowground in the manual defoliations treatment could
have occurred by way of 3 alternative pathways: soils, mycorrhizal
networks, or roots. The possibility for aboveground communication via
volatiles (Karban et al.,
2006) was excluded by covering the donors with airtight plastic bags
during defoliation, thereby isolating belowground communication pathways
(Dicke & Dijkman, 2001). If root exudates were transferred by the soil
pathway isotope in the receivers would have been detected in both 0.5 μm
mesh and no mesh treatments. If transfer had occurred via roots, Fraser
& Lieffers (Fraser, Lieffers & Landhausser, 2006) in
Pinus contorta Douglas,
isotope would have been detected in receivers in the no mesh treatment.
Instead, no transfer was found when mycorrhizal networks were excluded
with a 0.5 μm mesh, or permitted root-root contact in the no mesh
treatment. It was suggested by these results that the transfer of carbon
only occurred though mycorrhizal networks.
As was expected, based on previous research by Bingham & Simard (Bingham
& Simard, 2012), the presence of root competition reduced or masked the
mycorrhizal transfer of carbon to ponderosa pine. According to Song et
al. it is possible that any
movement of carbon through the intact mycorrhizal network in the no mesh
treatment was bidirectional, as was shown in (Simard et
al., 1997) & (Philip et
al., 2010), but the interior
Douglas-fir was a stronger competitor than the ponderosa pine for this
carbon pool. The reduced germination and growth rates of ponderosa pine
in the no mesh treatment versus mesh treatments, where interior
Douglas-fir roots could mingle freely with those of ponderosa pine,
supported the strong competitive ability of the roots of interior
Douglas-fir to acquire belowground carbon. It is indicated by its
smaller root structure than ponderosa pine that competitive effects of
interior Douglas-fir were driven primarily by belowground rather than
aboveground processes, which precluded interior Douglas-fir pre-empting
light from ponderosa pine.
A ‘mesh effect’ is not supported by the data from this study, where
restricted access to grazing invertebrates or greater water retention in
the 35 μm bags may have benefited the growth of ponderosa pine, and
therefore its sink strength for transferred carbon. High transfer rates
of carbon would have been found in the 0.5 μm mesh as well as the 35 μm
mesh bags if there was such a mesh effect, but no such effect was found.
Also, the presence of the effect of mesh or mesh size on the
availability of water to interior Douglas-fir or ponderosa pine within a
pot was not found. Moreover, native soil that was used to fill the mesh
bags was likely to have contained as many invertebrate grazers as soil
in the remainder of the pot. The ability to detect transfer of carbon to
ponderosa pine in 35 μm mesh but not in the no-mesh treatment was,
therefore, not due to artefacts that were caused by the presence of mesh
itself, but is explained most plausibly by the absence of root
competition from interior Douglas-fir.
According to Song et al. the
transfer of carbon from interior Douglas-fir to ponderosa pine through
the mycorrhizal network may have occurred along a carbon or foliar
nutrient source-sink gradient (Francis & Read, 1984). A carbon
source-sink strength alone could possibly have played a role in
regulating the transfer of carbon. It is likely that defoliation
stimulated interior Douglas-fir to export rapidly labile carbon from
enriched roots to the mycorrhizal network (Vanderklein & Reich, 1999),
thereby increasing the source strength, while the rapid growth rate of
the ponderosa pine would at the same time have developed a large sink
strength. The high amount of carbon that was transferred to receiver
shoots in this case would have moved through the xylem or transpiration
stream as carbohydrates, drawn by high rates of transpiration of the
ponderosa pine shoots (1989). The preferential movement of labelled
carbon to receiver shoots that was found in this study has also been
found by others (Simard et al.,
2012; Deslippe & Simard, 2011; Lerat et
al., 2012), including cases
in which sink strength shifts over growing seasons (Simard et
al., 2012; Deslippe & Simard,
2011; Lerat et al., 2012),
which suggests that in ponderosa pine sink strength was an important
driver of carbon transfer through the mycorrhizal network.
Alternatively, carbon may have been transferred along a foliar nutrient
gradient, where carbon was transferred with nutrient elements as free
amino acids across the Hartig net of donors and receivers. An urgent
nutritional demand of the fast growing pine would have been met by the
rapid transfer of these nutrient elements in amino acids as they are
essential for enzyme complexes involved in photosynthesis and synthesis
of proteins.
Very high potential for carbon transfer belowground and/or sequestration
by these dry forest trees by about half of the total carbon that was
fixed in this study was partitioned to belowground pools. In the manual
defoliation treatment, a large portion (6-8%) was transferred to the
Ponderosa pine, though most of the 13C remained in the donor
seedlings. It is suggested that the carbon that was transferred
contributed significantly to biosynthesis in the receiver, by this rate
of interspecific transfer though mycorrhizal networks being
approximately equivalent to the carbon costs of reproduction (Reekie &
Bazzaz, 1987). The rate of carbon transfer that was observed in this
study was similar to that found through mycorrhizal networks between
ectomycorrhizal
Betula payrifera Marsh
and Douglas-fir by Simard et al.,
(Simard et al., 1997) and
Philip et al., (Philip,
Simard & Jones, 2010), and between conspecific
Betula nana pairs in the
Arctic tundra by Deslippe & Simard (Deslippe & Simard, 2011), but is
greater than carbon transfer between conspecific interior Douglas-fir
pairs that were found in temperate forests by Teste et
al., (Teste et
al., 2009), or Bingham &
Simard (Bingham & Simard, 2012). It is suggested by these comparisons
that strong source-sink gradients that result from species physiology or
harsh environmental conditions drive higher rates of carbon transfer
than occur between conspecifics in favourable environments.
Stress signalling
In the interior Douglas-fir and the ponderosa pine receivers the
significance of defensive enzyme activities following either manual or
insect defoliation of interior Douglas-fir supports the 2nd
hypothesis of Song et al.
that interspecific communication of stress signals would increase the
defence response of the receiver. In agreement with the expectations of
this study, based on Song et al.,
(Song et al., 2010; Song et
al., 2014), it was found that
the activity of all 3 defence enzymes in receivers increased more in 35
μm mesh treatment than 0.5 μm mesh or no mesh treatments, which
indicates that belowground stress signalling occurred predominantly
through mycorrhizal networks. It is suggested by the much smaller
increases in enzyme activities in receivers in the 0.5 μm and no mesh
treatments, that a lesser amount of stress signal is transmitted through
the soil pathway. Stress signals that enter the soil pathway would be
subjected to the same microbial degradation as carbon exudates, which is
consistent with the observations of this study. In the non-defoliated
controls enzyme activities were always lowest, which indicates that the
mycorrhization per se did not prime the enzymatic defence response
(i.e., mycorrhiza-induced resistance), as was discussed by Cameron et
al., 2013). Song et
al. concluded therefore that
mycorrhizal networks transmitted chemical signals that elicited the
defence response of ponderosa pine, which supports recent studies in
arbuscular mycorrhizal systems by Song et
al., (Song et
al., , 2010; Song et
al., 2014) and Babikova et
al., (Babikova et
al., 2013). The Song et
al. expectation that
defoliation by insects would elicit a greater defensive response than
manual defoliation because of coevolution between tree and insect
species was not generally met. The transfer of carbon was likely to be
due to the .low feeding efficacy of western spruce budworms used in the
research. There expectation was, however, supported by a single
exception. The POD activity in donors that were defoliated by insects
peaked 24 hours after it did so in donors that were defoliated manually,
but it then remained higher in the donors than were defoliated by
insects. Moreover, in spite of a lower extent of defoliation by the
insect versus manually, in both donors and receivers the defence
responses were of similar magnitude. It was demonstrated by these
results that the light level of insect feeding on donors can elicit a
strong and rapid response in receivers. They support the idea that
regulation of the production of plant defence compounds is attuned
slightly to attack by herbivores, as was expected by from long standing
relationships that were coevolved between forest trees and herbivores.
It was also shown by the results of this study that an additional
interaction that was coevolved, the mycorrhizal symbiosis, and its
ability to integrate the plant and fungal community in a network,
influences the secondary chemistry of the conifers.
In both donors and receivers production of defence enzymes occurred
after injury, which suggests that stress signals were exported rapidly
to the mycorrhizal networks. Therefore, as defoliated interior
Douglas-fir was exporting carbon to ponderosa pine through the
mycorrhizal network, it was also transferring defence signals. A defence
response could then be induced by the healthy ponderosa pine to protect
itself against a possible attack. It was expected that signal
transduction would be much faster than the rate of carbon transfer
because the molecules of the signal are smaller than amino acids or
carbohydrates (Park et al.,
2007), thereby enabling them to move more quickly within hyphal networks
via cytoplasmic streaming. Though in this study carbon transfer was
measured only once after 6 days, a previous study that used 14C
autoradiography shows that it takes at least 3 days for the transfer of
carbon from donors to receivers through ectomycorrhizal networks (Wu,
Nara & Hogetsu, 2001). In contrast to this, it was found by Song et
al., (Song et
al., 2014) that the signal
molecule jasmonate travelled through the arbuscular mycorrhizal network
within 6 hours of infestation by insects based on the accumulation of
jasmonate and jasmonate response gene transcripts in receiver tomato
plants. The possibility is also raised, however, by recent research on
electrical signals produced by pants in response to mechanical and
insect chewing damage that the defence was electrically induced via
membrane depolarisation events (Brand & Gow, 2009; Salvador-Recatala et
al., 2014).
Host specificity
The communication that was observed by Song et
al. between interior
Douglas-fir and ponderosa pine in response to mechanical and insect
defoliation of interior Douglas-fir suggests that the damage elicited a
general response. According to Song et
al. the networking fungus may
have acted to protect its net carbon source by allocating carbon and
signals to the healthy, more reliable ponderosa pine. The mycorrhizal
network may therefore benefit from transferring carbon and defence
signals interspecifically, thereby favouring hosts that are able to
provide more carbon (Kiers et al.,
2011). Song et al. suggest it
is possible, therefore that transfer and signals that are mycorrhizal
network-based may evolve to be more generic in stressful environments.
The response of the ponderosa pine to a stress signal from interior
Douglas-fir may have a large cost and little benefit if the damaging
agent is host specific, but if the damage is nonspecific, such as manual
defoliation, it may be worth investing in constitutive defence enzymes.
It is intriguing that ponderosa pine mounted a defence response to the
attack on its interspecific neighbour, though western spruce budworm is
a herbivore of interior Douglas-fir, and to a lesser degree
Larix, Picea and
Abies species. It is
suggested by the defence response occurring in response to host-specific
and host-generalist damage that the defence signal itself was a generic
signal (e.g., jasmonate). It is also possible that ponderosa pine
responds particularly well to abiotic damage and broad herbivore taxa
(Bidart-Bouzat & Kliebenstein, 2011). In this study the decoupling of
carbon and defence signal transfer, which was evident in the
differential manual versus insect defoliation effect, suggests that
interspecific transfer of carbon and defence signal occurred with host
generalist damage (i.e. mechanical damage that can occur in response to
abiotic stresses such as wind or drought), though that interspecific
signal transduction was possible, even with the host-specific damage.
Because of the differences in the foliar treatments, carbon that was
transferred was therefore not likely to be a constituent of the defence
signal. Song et al. suggest
further research is needed to understand the compounds, mechanisms,
specificity and fitness consequences of communication through
mycorrhizal networks.
Conclusions
It was found by Song et al.
that physiologically significant levels of photosynthate derived carbon
was transferred by mycorrhizal networks and they transmitted
interspecific stress signals that elicited defence responses in
ponderosa pine following manual and insect defoliation of interior
Douglas-fir. Mycorrhizal networks were shown by these results to be
mediators of interactions among trees of different species and
defoliators and, therefore, are likely to play a critical role in the
defence response and recovery of forests from ether abiotic or insect
outbreaks. Shifts in forest composition that are predicted with climate
change may be facilitated by the direct pathway and stress signal
transfer trough mycorrhizal networks to interspecific plant targets.
Insect pest epidemics and summer droughts in many forests in western
North America that are exacerbated by climate change are leaving vast
areas of dead trees. These forests are expected to undergo domain shifts
to new, hopefully productive stable states of different forest
vegetation composition as these forests regenerate. Mycorrhizal networks
have been shown by this study to be positioned to play an important role
in facilitation of regeneration of migrant species that have adapted
better to warmer climates and to be primed for resistance to infestation
of insect pests. The importance of conservation practices maintain all
of the parts and processes of these highly interconnected forest
ecosystems in order to help them deal with new stresses that are brought
by the changing climate have been pointed to by these results.
Song, Y., et al. (2015). "Defoliation of interior Douglas-fir elicits
carbon transfer and stress signalling to ponderosa pine neighbors
through ectomycorrhizal networks." Scientific Reports 5:
8495.
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
Author: M.H.Monroe Email: admin@austhrutime.com Sources & Further reading |