![]() |
||||||||||||||
|
Australia: The Land Where Time Began |
||||||||||||||
|
Denisovan Admixture and the First Modern Human Dispersal into
Southeast Asia and Oceania
Recent genetic research has shown that the ancestors of the native
population of New Guinea and the people of Bougainville have inherited
part of their genetic material from Denisovans. There has been only
sparse sampling of Southeast Asian and Oceanian populations for
analysis. In this paper Reich et
al. quantify the admixture of Denisovan genetic material in 33
additional populations from Asia and Oceania. Genetic material from
Denisovans has been inherited by Australian Aboriginals, Near Oceanians,
Polynesians, Fijians, east Indonesians (west New Guineans), and Mamanwa
(a “Negrito” group from the Philippines), though populations from
mainland East Asia, western Indonesia, Jehai (a Negrito group from
Malaysia), and Onge (a negrito group from the Andaman Islands), have not
inherited Denisovan genetic material. It is indicated by these results
that the flow of genes from Denisovans occurred into common ancestors of
New Guineans, Australians, and Mamanwa, though not into the ancestors of
the Jehai and Onge which also indicates that relatives of East Asians of
the present were not in Southeast Asia when the genes from Denisovans
entered the genomes of those who received the Denisovan genes. The
findings of this study, the descendants of the earliest inhabitants of
Southeast Asia do not all have the admixture of Denisovan genetic
material is not consistent with a history in which the interbreeding
with Denisovans took place in mainland Asia after which it spread over
Southeast Asia, leading to all of the earliest modern human inhabitants
of Southeast Asia having the admixture. Instead of this the most
parsimonious interpretation of the data suggests the Denisovan gene flow
actually occurred in Southeast Asia. According to this scenario archaic
Denisovans must have occupied an extraordinary extensive territory
stretching from Siberia to tropical Asia.
Discussion
It has been shown by this study that modern humans settled Southeast
Asia in waves: The ancestors of the present-day Onge, Jehai, Mamanwa,
New Guineans, and Australians, some of whom admixed with Denisovans, and
a second wave that contributed much of the ancestry of the present East
Asians and Indonesians. Reich et
al. suggest that this scenario in which the human dispersals are
broadly consistent with the archaeologically-motivated hypothesis that
there was an early migration by the southern route that led to the
colonisation of Southeast Asia (2) though it also clarifies this
scenario. In particular, no evidence of multiple dispersals of modern
humans out of Africa is provided by the data of Reich et
al., as all non-Africans have
amounts of Neanderthal DNA that are statistically indistinguishable
(12,18). The data produced by this study are instead consistent with a
single dispersal out of Africa (as has been proposed by some southern
route hypotheses (1), from which there were then multiple dispersals to
South and East Asia.
According to Reich et al.
this study also provides a clue concerning the geographic location of
the flow of Denisovan genes. It is difficult to use genetic data from
populations of the present to infer the location of demographic events
in the past with a high degree of confidence, given the high mobility of
human populations. It has been found that Denisovan genetic material is
present in eastern Southeast Asians and Oceanians, which includes
Mamanwa, Australian Aboriginals and New Guineans, but not in west
Asians, the Onge and Jehai, or from the northwest, the Eurasian
continent, which suggests that the location of the interbreeding may
have been in Southeast Asia. The results from the study reported in this
paper uncovered further evidence from locations in Southeast Asia of
ancient gene flow from relatives of the Onge and Jehai into the common
ancestors of Australian Aboriginals and New Guineans following the
initial flow of genes from Denisovans; and it is suggested by this that
the ancestors of both these groups, though not East Asians, were present
in the region at the time. Reich et
al. suggest that an
alternative history in which some genetic material of Denisovans was
initially present throughout Southeast Asia – which was subsequently
displaced by subsequent migrations of populations related to populations
of present-day East Asians – though such a history cannot, according to
Reich et al., parsimoniously
explain the absence of Denisovan genetic material in the Onge and Jehai.
It is therefore suggested by the evidence from Southeast Asian locations
for the Denisovan admixture, which has been presented in this paper,
that the Denisovans were spread throughout a wider ecological and
geographic region, stretching from the deciduous forests of Siberia to
the tropics, than any hominin other than modern humans.
Reich et al. suggest this
study is methodically important as it shows that there is much to learn
about the relationships among modern humans by the analysis of patterns
of genetic material that was contributed by archaic humans. Archaic
genetic material is easily detected in the genomes of a modern human,
even if only a small proportion of the ancestry is contributed, as the
archaic genetic material is highly divergent; this makes possible the
use of archaic genetic material to study the ancient gene flow in the
same manner as dye material that has been injected into a medical
patient allows the tracing of blood vessels. Reich et
al. suggest a priority for
future research should be to obtain direct dates for the gene flow from
Neanderthals and Denisovans, as these will provide a better
understanding of interactions among Neanderthals, Denisovans and
ancestral populations of the modern human populations of the present.
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
| Author: M.H.Monroe Email: admin@austhrutime.com Sources & Further reading | ||||||||||||||