![]() |
||||||||||||||
|
Australia: The Land Where Time Began |
||||||||||||||
|
End-Triassic Mass Extinction – Marine Anoxia During the End Triassic
Indicated by an Enormous Sulphur Excursion
In the debate over the cause of the mass extinction event at the close
of the Triassic the role of oceanic anoxia has been proposed. In this
paper He et al. presented
carbonate-associated sulphate δ34S data from sections that
span the Late Triassic-Early Jurassic transition which document
synchronous large positive excursions on a global scale over an interval
of ~50 Kyr (thousand years). It was demonstrated by biogeochemical
modelling that the perturbation of the sulphur isotope is explained best
by a 5-fold increase in global burial of pyrite, which is consistent
with development of marine anoxia on a large scale on the margin of
Panthalassa and the
northwestern European shelf. This burial of pyrite event coincides with
the loss of Triassic taxa that was observed in the sections that were
studied. It was also indicated by modelling results that the ocean
surface concentration of sulphate was low (<1 millimolar), a common
feature of many deoxygenation events in the Phanerozoic. He et
al. propose that the scarcity
of sulphate preconditions oceans for the development during intervals of
rapid warming by increasing the flux of the benthic methane and the
result of oxygen demand.
The end-Triassic mass extinction event (ETME) is one of the largest
biological crises that is known from the Phanerozoic and is regarded is
1 of the “Big 5” (Dunhill et al.,
2018). This extinction has been linked to large amounts of volcanism
that took place during the emplacement Central Atlantic Magmatic
Province (CAMP) and the environmental effects that were associated with
it (Ruhl et al., 2011).
Including among these effects were global warming and anoxia of the
ocean. It is suggested by existing evidence that there was widespread
basinal anoxia on the northern margin of Panthalassa on
Pangaea and that intense
shelf euxinia also became widespread in the latest Triassic-Earliest
Jurassic of Western Europe, though some of these conditions developed
about 150 kyr (thousand years) following the onset of the ETME (Richoz
et al., 2012; Kasprak et
al., 2015; Jaraula et
al., 2013; Wignall et
al., 2007). An increase in
the anoxic deposition of through the Triassic-Jurassic boundary is
suggested by additional findings from seawater δ238U in the
Lombardy Basin of western Tethys (Jost et
al., 2017). Clear evidence
for widespread anoxia in the latest Rhaetian in other oceans has been
found, however, that coincides directly with the onset of the ETME has
not been recorded, with the result that its role as the cause of the
marine component on the ETME has remained questionable (Wignall et
al., 2010).
Carbonate-associated sulphate (CAS) in bulk marine carbonate and
biogenic calcite has been used widely in the reconstruction of primary
seawater sulphate S isotope composition during major redox perturbations
of the surface of the Earth system (Newton et
al., 2011; Owens et
al., 2013; Gill, Lyons &
Jenkyns, 2011; Luo et al.,
2010; He et al., 2019).
Variation in the fluxes and isotopic compositions of riverine sulphate
sources and marine pyrite burial dynamically control seawater sulphate δ34S.
Sulphate removed from the oceans via gypsum precipitation does not
impart a isotopic fractionation, though the global sulphate reservoir is
made smaller, and therefore more isotopically susceptible to changes in
other fluxes (Garrels & Lerman, 1981). A primary redox-a sensitive
pathway in the marine sulphur cycle is represented by the production and
burial of pyrite, which drives a large offset between the sulphur
isotopic composition of seawater sulphate and sedimentary pyrite pools,
therefore may control variations in the S isotope composition of oceanic
sulphate (δ34SCAS) through time. It seems that
large and rapid global-scale S isotope perturbations, as well as the
small ocean sulphate reservoirs that are needed to produce them, are a
feature of major deoxygenation events of the Phanerozoic (Newton et
al., 2011; Owens et
al., 2013; Gill, Lyons &
Jenkyns, 2011; Luo et al.,
2010; He et al., 2019).
Direct records of changes in the marine sulphate pool, and therefore
impacts on the global sulphur cycle, have not been documented, though
there is some evidence in the sedimentary pyrite isotope record that
suggests the regional development of marine anoxia at the ETME (Jaraula
et al., 2013; Williford,
Foriel, Ward & Luo, 2018). In this paper He et
al. report 3 open marine
CAS-δ34SCAS profiles from Sicily [Mount Sparagio
section (MS)], Northern Island [Cloghan Point section (CP)], and British
Columbia [Black Bear Ridge section (BBR)]. These derive from both
Tethyan and Panthalassan locations; the first 2 sections have archived
well preserved, shallow water, peritidal, micritic , and shelly
limestones and shell materials (Todaro et
al., 2017; Simms, 2007); and
the last section is comprised of open-shelf, organic-rich, and
bivalve-rich, marly limestone (Wignall et
al., 2007; Sephton et
al., 2002). The Norian to
lower Hettangian are spanned by this section and record the major losses
of the ETME (Wignall et al.,
2007; Todaro et al., 2017;
Simms, 2007; Sephton et al.,
2002). They provide, therefore, a window into the possible links between
the ecosystem response and the marine redox variations in oceans of the
Late Triassic across a broad area.
Discussion
Latest Triassic anoxia, enhanced burial of pyrite, and low marine
sulphate
The positive swings that have been observed in the S isotopic
compositions of seawater sulphate in the latest
Triassic could
have been driven by an increase in the net burial of sedimentary pyrite
under of expanded anoxic/euxinic conditions. Enhanced microbial sulphate
reduction (SR) resulting from these conditions leads to an enhanced
burial flux of pyrite on the continental shelves and slopes when
available iron and organic matter is in sufficient supply. Elevated
burial fluxes on a global scale would drive the seawater sulphate δ34S
to values that are more positive, because pyrite is depleted in the
heavier 34S. The oxidative biotic pathway of the global
sulphur cycle may also have the potential to drive seawater Sulphate δ34S
enrichment to some extent by microbial sulphide oxidation by some
sulphide-oxidising microorganisms (Pellgrin et
al., 2019). The contribution
of this oxidative metabolic pathway to the sulphur of the oceans has
remained unclear, however, and there is no obvious mechanism by which it
could have driven a prolonged positive S isotope excursion in the
sulphate inventory of the global seawater. It may be possible on a
larger scale to drive S isotope variations by altering the rates of
weathering of continental pyrite and gypsum; a cession of pyrite
weathering and a switch to an isotopically heavy riverine flux might be
represented here by a geologically sudden increase in seawater δ34S.
A time-dependant sulphur cycle single-box model was applied, in order to
investigate the response of seawater
δ34S to variations of the oceanic inventory of
sulphate and the degree of change in the net pyrite burial flux. It was
assumed by the model that the isotopic composition of pyrite and gypsum
weathering fluxes remain constant, and then experiments alter the input
and output of pyrite through either weathering or burial. A substantial
increase in the model of the burial of pyrite by approximately a factor
of 5 and a very small marine reservoir of sulphate (<1 mM) is required
to replicate the magnitude and
timing δ34S shift. The version of the model that was used in
this study fixes the isotopic enrichment of buried pyrite to 30‰ more
negative than contemporaneous seawater sulphate, but the expansion of
euxinia may have increased this enrichment factor; therefore, they also
experiment with a scenario in which this is increased to 40‰ during the
event (Owens et al., 2013).
There is s very similar requirement of this experiment for a large
increase in the burial of pyrite and very low concentrations of seawater
sulphate. Note that in the modelling approach of He et
al. it is the size, direction
and duration of change that are the important foundation. As a similar
sized isotope excursion is present in all records, Differences in
regional sulphate baselines have no impact on the conclusions obtained
from the modelling work. Replicating the change in δ34S by
reducing the weathering rate of pyrite, while maintaining the same
gypsum weathering flux, is much more difficult and requires a complete
cessation of pyrite weathering and extremely low levels of oceanic
sulphate (~0.1 mM). Even then, the shape of the excursion is not readily
reproducible, as the very low concentrations of sulphate means that the
system recovers rapidly from the perturbation.
By using the maximum rate of change in δ34SCAS the
maximum marine concentrations of sulphate can be estimated
independently. An upper estimate for marine sulphate is given by the
“rate method” (He et al.,
2019; Algeo et al., 2015)
model as about 0.2 to 1.1 for the interval through the Late
Triassic-positive isotope excursion event. The lower end of these
estimates of maximum is consistent with the calculations that were
inferred from the sulphur cycle box model of He et
al. The intervals that
predate and those during the positive S isotope excursion event,
therefore, appear to be characterised by a scarcity of oceanic sulphate
when compared to a higher fluid inclusion based estimate of ≥13 mM
during the Carnian. Though was about 20 Myr earlier (Horita, Zimmermann
& Holland, 2002). In the later Triassic the development of a low
sulphate ocean was likely to have been caused by the deposition of
substantial amounts of evaporite. Minimum estimate of global halite
deposition suggest there was a 16-fold increase from the Middle to Late
Triassic, as is shown in global compilations for this interval (Hay et
al., 2006). Contrasting with
this, a low level of evaporite occurrence that followed the end-Permian
extinction was experienced in the earlier part of the Triassic (Hay et
al., 2006). In rift basins
that were newly formed, that developed in an arid climate, as the
breakup of Pangaea began, evaporites from the Late Triassic (Hay et
al., 2006). E.g., when
examined on a regional scale, the deposition of evaporite became
widespread surrounding the North Atlantic rift (northeastern Grand
Banks, Oranian meseta, and Western Europe) during the Late Triassic and
subsequently peaked in the Earliest Jurassic (Holser et
al., 1988).
The rapid expansion of anoxia during is facilitated by low sulphate
He et al. propose in this
paper a conceptual model to link these observations. A major control
over the balance between 3 biogeochemical pathways in marine sediments
that are microbially mediated:
SR (SO42- +2CH2O → h2S +2
HCO3-),
Methanogenesis (CH3OO- + H+ → VH4
+ CO2 and CO2 + 4H2 → CH4 +
2H2O), and
the anaerobic oxidation of methane (AOM) (CH4 + SO42-
→ HCO3- + HS- + H2O).
Under conditions of high sulphate such as the modern ocean SR consumes
large amounts of organic carbon, while methane is produced in the deeper
sediment where sulphate has been depleted. AOM is fuelled by the
overlying pore water which is rich in sulphate, and prevents the escape
of methane, therefore limiting the consumption of oxygen in the
bottom-water. Under conditions of low sulphate availability in contrast,
the balance of processes that oxidise organic matter in marine sediments
shifts in favour of methanogenesis, as widely occurs in freshwater
sediments (e.g., lakes) (Wassmann & Thein, 1996; Jørgensen & Kasten,
2006), where the supply of sulphate is usually limited. The
sulphur-methane transition zone is brought closer to the sediment-water
interface (SWI) by lower concentrations of sulphate, and the amount of
organic matter that is consumed by SR is reduced, and the amount of
organic matter that is consumed is ultimately increased the flux of
organic carbon to methanogens and limits the capacity for anaerobic
oxidation of the remaining methane. The organic matter that has reached
the zone of maximum methanogenesis will also have increased reactivity.
A greater flux of methane from the sediment is the result of this, which
leads to increased aerobic respiration close to the SWI, which increases
the burden on the O2 in the bottom water (Luo et
al., 2010; et
al., 2018; Hall et
al., 2018; Wortmann, 2007).
About 98% of buried organic carbon in the ocean is stored in marginal
sediments of the continents in the modern system (Jørgensen & Kasten,
2006). About 20% on average of the global organic carbon flux (~191 Tmol
C/year to the sea floor is processed by SR and about 3-4% is converted
to methane, which gives an annual methane flux from the seafloor of ~5.7
to 7.6 Tmol methane/year (Jørgensen & Kasten, 2006; Bowles et
al., 2014; Egger et
al., 2018). The rate of SR
will be reduced by a similar amount, if it assumed that there is a
drawdown in the concentration of oceanic sulphate by about 97%, which is
the modern value, to 1 mM, and that the excess organic matter will all
be used by methanogens (i.e., they now process about 22-23% of the
organic carbon), then the methane flux would rise to ~42 to 49 Tmol CH4/year.
According to He et al. this
calculation is conservative, as any increase in the reactivity of the
organic matter as it reaches the methanogenic zone is not taken into
account. Also, AOM suppression under these conditions of low sulphate
would make it easier to reach the water column and consume free O2.
Further modelling is required in order to make calculations that are
more detailed on the expected impact of low sulphate conditions of
oxygen demand in the water column, but this is beyond the scope of this
study, though it was demonstrated by the calculations of He et
al. that there is clear
potential for at least 6- or 7-fold increase in elevation of the methane
flux at SWI and a concomitant increase in the global consumption of
benthic O2. Note that these elevated demands on bottom water
O2 exist where concentrations of sulphate are low prior to
any additional drivers from the release of volcanic O2.
It is not simple to find evidence for elevated the aerobic oxidation of
methane under condition s of low sulphate in the sedimentary record
because of the resulting dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) flux, while it
is large when considered in the context of the uptake of dissolved O2,
it is small when compared to the abundance of ocean DIC, especially when
oxidation takes place in the water column as proposed. Carbonate cements
which are isotopically depleted form from pore water are features of the
sedimentary record, and therefore do not provide definitive evidence. It
is likely that calcifying organisms that live at the SWI provide the
best archive for recording this process, evidence for which has been
recognised in high-latitude bivalves from the Late Cretaceous (Hall et
al., 2018).
A key feature of the conceptual model of He et
al. is that poor conditions
are established prior to volcanic perturbation, probably by widespread
deposition of evaporite. Previously, the link between the expansion of
marine anoxia driven by large igneous province (LIP)-driven warming and
extinction events via decreased solubility of O2 in warmer
waters and increased productivity and the demand for O2 that
is driven by increased weathering fluxes of nutrients from land, and the
recycling of phosphorus once euxinic water conditions have been
established (Hall et al.,
2018). The oceans swill be predisposed to the rapid expansion of anoxic
conditions via these mechanisms through the higher oxygen demand of the
bottom-water of a steady-state Earth system with a small marine sulphate
reservoir. Also, it is likely that a low sulphate ocean will impose some
additional feedbacks once warming has been limited: Methane production
will increase with the temperature of the sediment, because the rate of
methanogenesis is highly temperature sensitive (Poulton et
al., 2015), a situation that
is amplified by the reduced depth go the methanogenic zone under low
sulphate conditions. Increased production of marine organic matter will
increase the delivery of organic matter and its reactivity to the
methanogenic zone in sediments, which again adds to increased methane
fluxes across SWI and the consumption of oxygen from methane oxidation.
As anoxic conditions expand the burial of pyrite will increase, which
would apply downwards pressure on concentrations of marine sulphate,
though increased sulphate weathering from land may counter this. Methane
release to the atmosphere may also be promoted elevated production of
global marine methane, and thereby contribute to warming trends that are
released by large-scale CO2 release, though much of the
produced methane is likely to be oxidised in the water column. The
explanation of why anoxic conditions were severe under low sulphate
conditions may be that these additional feedbacks and why not all
LIP-driven warming events lead to widespread depletion of oxygen.
Marine anoxia and mass extinction
Geochemical evidence, in the form of enrichment of elements that are
redox-sensitive (Mg and Mo), and of nitrogen isotope fluctuations,
suggest that there was a major intensification of the oxygen minimum
zone (OMZ) in the Panthalassa Ocean during the Triassic-Jurassic
transition (Wignall et al.,
2010), though anoxia may not have developed on the floor of the deep
ocean at that time (Wignall et al.,
2010). There is tangible for this where the OMZ impinged on the western
margin of the Pangaean supercontinent, which led to extensive deposition
of black shale in Western Canada (Wignall, Zonneveld et
al., 2007; Ward et
al., 2001). The latest shelf
seas of Western Europe, euxinia also became extensive, during as well as
at the termination of the mass extinction phase (Richoz & van de
Schootbrugge, 2012; Jaraula et al.,
2013). A possible measure of ocean redox conditions with negative
excursions of δ238U values, which signified enhanced
reduction from U (VI) to U (IV) (Jost et
al., 2017), is provided by
uranium isotope data from marine carbonates. When seen at the onset of a
mass extinction, such a signal suggests a major increase in the area of
anoxic deposition that lasted foe ~50 ka (Jost et
al., 2017).
It was revealed by the δ34SCAS excursions in this
study is that there is a similar link between the onset of mass
extinction and an isotopic excursion that is driven by anoxia. The
western Tethys (MS) is where the link is seen most clearly, where there
is the sudden loss of magalodont bivalves and the foraminifera
Triasina hantkeni at the
onset of the positive shift (Todaro et
al., 2017). Though there is
no direct evidence for anoxia at this peritidal location, some
contemporaneous anoxic sedimentary matrices that are found at a
neighbouring site that was also connected to the western Tethys
(Scopelitti et al., 2009).
The extinction level is still recorded, though there is a hiatus in the
Panthalassan section (BBR). This occurs in the dysoxic strata of the
basal Fernie Formation, the site of the last disappearance of the
Rhaetian conodonts, and it is coincident with the δ34SCAS
excursion (Wignall et al.,
2017). An earlier crisis at the end of the Norian that occurred several
million years earlier than the end Triassic event, is marked by the
extinction of the monotid bivalves at BBR (Wignall et
al., 2007; Sephton et
al., 2002). At CP the
end-Triassic extinction can be seen, where several species of bivalve,
which includes the Rhaetian marker
Rhaetavicula contorta
disappear from the fossil record at the base of the Cotham Member. At
this level, the lack of limestones precludes the measurement of δ34CCAS,
but the lowest data point that was obtained in this section, a short
distance above, displays a strongly positive value. In summary, the
major δ34SCAS that was found here is best
explained by a major burial event of pyrite that was driven by a
large-scale, increase in anoxia in the late Rhaetian. A-50 ka duration
for the initial positive shift is suggested by the age model of He et
al. for the MS section, a
time span that is remarkable accord with the 50-ka for the main anoxia
intensification during the latest Rhaetian based on the contemporary
uranium isotope record (Jost et
al., 2017). The gradual falling limb of the δ34SCAS
excursion corresponds with the second phase of limited anoxia that
extended into the Hettangian (Jost et
al., 2017). The
intensification of the Panthalassan OMZ and the deposition of black
shales on the margin of Pangaea and in the shelf seas of Europe also
occurred during this event. The shallowest water locations, such as MS,
remained oxygenated. The coincidences of the δ34SCAS
excursion with the extinction losses implicate anoxia as an important
factor in the crisis.
Recurring OAEs punctuated the Late Permian and Mesozoic Era accompanied
by hyperthermal events and enhanced weathering that coincide with the
eruption of LIPs (Ruhl et al.,
2011; Lou et al., 2010;
Poulton et al., 2015). Large
positive shifts of sulphur isotope in seawater sulphate provide that
there is evidence of a greatly reduced marine sulphate reservoir and
enhanced burial of pyrite for many of these OAEs (Newton et
al., 2011; Owens et
al., 2013; Gill, Lyons &
Jenkyns, 2011; Luo et al.,
2010). He et al. explain this
generalised coincidence by a mechanism linkage between low dissolved
sulphate, enhanced generation of methane in sediment, and consequent
elevated consumption of bottom-water O2. He et
al. propose, therefore, that
a low sulphate boundary condition prior to volcanically driven
greenhouse warming events makes the expansion of anoxic conditions more
likely, and that during the events associated feedbacks extend the
geographic reach and intensity of anoxia. Many of these events are
preceded by increased evaporite burial fluxes, which suggests that this
is the mechanism for the removal of sulphate from the ocean (Hay et
al., 2006; Wortmann &
Chernyavsky, 2007; Mills et al.,
2017). The development of widespread anoxia during rapid warming may,
however, ultimately trace some of its origins to widespread rifting or
other circumstances that form favourable conditions for deposition of
evaporite.
He, T., et al. (2020). "An enormous sulfur isotope excursion indicates
marine anoxia during the end-Triassic mass extinction." Science
Advances 6(37): eabb6704.
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
| Author: M.H.Monroe Email: admin@austhrutime.com Sources & Further reading | ||||||||||||||