![]() |
||||||||||||||
|
Australia: The Land Where Time Began |
||||||||||||||
|
Human Occupation of Wallacea – Isotopic Evidence for Initial
Coastal Colonisation and Subsequent Diversification
Wallacea is comprised of a group of islands that are poor in resources
that has been considered to be a major adaptive obstacle to hominins
that expanded into Australasia. It has been hinted at by archaeological
evidence that coastal adaptations in
Homo sapiens enabled
rapid island dispersal and settlement; however there has been no means
to test this proposition directly. In this study Roberts et
al. applied stable carbon and
oxygen isotope analysis to the tooth enamel of humans and fauna from 6
archaeological sites that dated to the Late
Pleistocene
across Wallacea. The earliest human forager that has been found in this
region was demonstrated by the results to date from ~42 ka made
significant use of coastal resources earlier than the subsequent niche
diversification that has been shown by later individuals. It is argued
by Roberts et al. that their
data provides clear insights into the huge adaptive flexibility of
humans, which includes our ability to specialise in the use of varied
environments, particularly when compared with other species of hominin
from island Southeast Asia.
It is being demonstrated by recent, high profile studies of symbolic
material culture (e.g., Aubert et al., 2019), technological complexity
(e.g., Akhilesh et al., 2018), fossil morphology and chronology (e.g.,
Rizal et al., 2020), and
genetics (Reich et al., 2011)
an increasingly complex and dynamic picture of the capacities and
interactions of different hominin populations in the Late Pleistocene
(125-12 ka), in particular in Asia. If the uniqueness of
Homo sapiens is to be
determined, the last extant hominin on the planet, it is becoming
apparent that the way in which its ecological adaptations differed from
those of the genus
Homo needs to be examined
(Rabett, 2012; Roberts & Stewart, 2018). It has been suggested that
populations of
Homo sapiens that were
expanding around the world in the Late Pleistocene were able to not only
exploit flexibly varied, and often extreme, environments – which
included deserts, tropical rainforests, high-altitude settings, and deep
sea maritime habitats – while also specialising in the occupation of
them, and so enable our species as a whole to proliferate even while
local communities sometimes failed (Roberts & Stewart, 2018). Earlier
and contemporaneous species of
Homo that were expanding
into Eurasia in the Early and Middle Pleistocene (2.6 Ma – 126 ka) made
genera use of forest and grassland mosaics (Zhu et
al., 2008; Gamble, 1993),
which made them potentially vulnerable to more extreme environmental
changes that occurred in the Late Pleistocene (e.g., Rizal et
al., 2020) and incapable of
surviving on islands that were depauperate in large terrestrial fauna
(Gamble, 1993).
Given recent finds that other species of hominin may have ventured into
challenging adaptive settings (Reich et
al., 2011; Chen et
al., 2019), testing this
hypothesis is particularly timely. An ideal ‘island laboratory’ setting
is provided by Wallacea in which to do so in the increasingly
paleoanthropologically significant Southeast Asian region. Wallacea is
an isolated series of islands that have never been connected to
neighbouring Pleistocene landmasses of Sunda or Sahul, which
necessitates a waster crossing to reach (O’Connor et
al., 2017; Bird, Taylor &
Hunt, 2005; Bird et al.,
2019; Norman et al., 2017).
It has been hypothesised that
these islands host depauperate island forest environments, that lack
reliable terrestrial protein and carbohydrate resources (O’Connor, Ono &
Clarkson, 2011; O’Connell & Allen, 2012; Samper Carro et
al., 2016). It is significant
that while these islands are home to some of the earliest evidence of
earliest
H. sapiens east of Africa
and the Middle East ~45 ka (O’Connor, Ono & Clarkson, 2011; Hawkins et
al., 2017; Shipton et
al., 2019), and it is also
suggested by finds of artefacts that earlier members of the genus
Homo were present on the
island of Flores from ~1 Ma (Morwood et
al., 2005; Van den Bergh et
al., 2016), Luzon from 0.7 Ma
(Ingicco et al., 2018), and
Sulawesi from ~0.2 Ma (Van den Bergh et
al., 2016). More direct
assessments of overall hominin resource reliance and palaeoenvironmental
changes in the region have been lacking, though some insights into the
ecological niches of different populations in Wallacea have been
provided by zooarchaeological records.
In this paper Roberts et al.
examined the adaptations of the earliest known fossil members of
Homo sapiens that have
been found in Wallacia by the use of isotopic analysis of archaeological
human tooth enamel from 2 islands, Timor and Alor. The earliest known
dated material culture and fossil evidence for
H. sapiens in Wallacia
was found at the sites of Asitau Kuru (formerly Jerimalai) and Laili on
the island of Timor (Hawkins et
al., 2017; Shipton et al.,
2019). It is suggested by faunal remains and cultural artefacts at
Asitau Kuru that during the Late Pleistocene humans relied on marine
shellfish and fish, which were partly obtained by fishing (O’Connor, Ono
& Clarkson, 2011). Evidence of early reliance on marine resources is
also provided at Laili (Hawkins et
al., 2017). This contrasts
with the generalised adaptations to mixed grasslands and woodlands that
were associated with other hominins in the region (O’Connor et
al., 2017; Roberts & Amano,
2019; Brumm et al., 2019).
Human reliance on fishing at Asitau Kuru has, however, been questioned
(Louys et al., 2018). There
remains, moreover, the possibility that giant rat taxa, which has been
proposed to have had a preference for closed forest environments and to
have had a body weight of adults of up to 6 kg, which represented
significant food resources; and they have been identified in early
coastal and inland archaeological contexts in Alor and Timor (e.g.,
Louys et al., 2018).
Insights into the environments that were present, as well as human
reliance on different ecosystems is difficult to resolve by the use of
traditional zooarchaeological methods alone due to the preservation
biases and the role of nonhuman predators in site taphonomy (e.g.,
Samper Carro et al., 2017).
In this study Roberta et al.
applied stable (δ13C) and oxygen (δ18O) isotope
analyses to the enamel of human and faunal teeth from 6 archaeological
sequences dating to the Late Pleistocene/Holocene on Timor and Alor in
order to determine reliance of early human colonisers of Wallacea on
tropical forest and terrestrial versus marine resources. Stable isotope
analysis of faunal (including hominin) tooth enamel in tropical regions
has been used in the assessment of proportion of C3 dominated
woodland/forest and C4 grassland biomass in diets (Lee-Thorp,
Sealy & van der Merwe, 1989; Levin et
al., 2008; Roberts et
al., 2017). In regions such
as Wallacea in the Pleistocene, where it has been suggested by some
researchers that tropical forests dominated terrestrial environments
(Monk, de Fretes & Reksodiharjo-Lilley, 1997) with grasslands considered
to be absent the canopy effect will be the most significant driver of
stable isotope variation, whereby low light and respired CO2
cause plant biomass that dwell in forest and its consumers to have more
negative 13C values than their counterparts in more open
habitats (Levin et al., 2008;
Roberts et al., 2017).
Meanwhile, marine producer biomass has higher 13C than all C3
plants (Smith & Epstein, 1971; Fry, 2006), which allows marine consumers
to be distinguished from terrestrial C3 consumers (Kusaka et
al., 2015). Roberts et
al. expect, based on research
carried out in East Africa (Levin et
al., 2008), Sri Lanka
(Roberts et al., 2017), and
Japan (Kusaka et al., 2015),
including extensive modern studies (Levin et
al., 2008), preindustrial
humans that relied completely on tropical forest, open C3
resources, and marine resources to have tooth enamel δ13C
values of about -14‰, about -11‰, and about -4‰, respectively.
Additional palaeoecological information about water and food is provided
by stable isotope (18O) measurements from the tooth enamel of
animals, and has also been argued to distinguish terrestrial from marine
consumers (Clementz & Koch,
2001). The deposits at Asitau Kuru, Matja Kuru 1 and 2, Lene Hara,
Makpan, and Tron Bon Lei provide a unique suite of human and associated
faunal samples that span the earliest fossil appearance of
H. sapiens in Wallacea
through the
Last
Glacial Maximum (LGM) and across the terminal transition from the
Pleistocene to the Holocene (Hawkins et
al., 2017; Shipton et
al., 2019), based on
existing, published and available chronological information. Coastal and
hinterland habitats are both covered by them. The building of the first
detailed palaeontological and palaeoenvironmental records for Wallacia
in the Pleistocene is allowed by ample marine and terrestrial animal
remains as well as test assumptions in relation to:
1)
Pure C3 terrestrial environments on Timor and Alor in the
past;
2)
The 13C distinction between available marine and terrestrial
resources; and
3)
Environmental shifts across the Pleistocene-Holocene boundary that has
been proposed elsewhere in Southeast Asia (e.g., Rabett, 2012; Cannon,
Morley & Bush, 2009).
Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) as per Roberts et
al. (Roberts et
al., 2017; Roberts et
al., 2018), was also used to
check the preservation of a subsection of the analysed tooth enamel
sample.
It is demonstrated by the extensive faunal baseline of Roberts et
al. that terrestrial and
marine environments can be clearly distinguished isotopically in
Wallacea on the basis of stable isotope analysis of fossil tooth enamel.
It is shown by a tooth of the
H. sapiens that was the
earliest known that has been preserved that was found from the region of
~42-39 ka, demonstrates that this individual made significant use of
coastal resources. Human populations show an increasing reliance on
interior, terrestrial environments on the islands of Timor and Alor at a
time when there was increasing forest expansion in Island Southeast Asia
more generally, though there were some individuals that continued to use
marine resources intensively. It is argued by Roberts et
al. that their data
demonstrates further the huge adaptive flexibility of our species, which
is acutely visible as it rapidly and persistently colonised Wallacean
environments. The ability of
H. sapiens to the use of
more extreme environments seems to contrast with that of other hominin
species that are known from Southeast Asia based on current evidence.
Discussion
Direct assessment of the ecological reliance on different categories of
resources that accompanied the arrival of
H. sapiens and subsequent
settling of Wallacea was allowed by the stable isotope data of Roberts
et al. When the earliest
humans arrived in this part of the world they seemed to be specialised
in the use of coastal resources. Though it is currently not possible to
distinguish between pelagic and the use of other offshore resources
(O’Connor, Ono & Clarkson, 2011),
Roberts et al. have
confidence that the δ13C value for this individual indicates
that he relied on marine resources. A clear diversification of human use
of resources across Wallacea emerged after 20,000 cal. BP. Most
individuals demonstrated broader use of interior environments, which
included closed tropical forest habitats, though it is indicated that 1
individual at Matja Kuru 2, and possibly also Makpan, showed some
coastal reliance. Roberts et al.
suggest that this may be considered surprising, particularly given the
ongoing presence of fish and shellfish (O’Connor et
al., 2017), the presence of
fish hooks in a symbolic burial of an individual at Tron Bon Lei
(Supplementary note 1), as well as archaeological evidence for transfer
of material culture between islands from time to time (Reepmeyer et
al., 2019; Shipton et
al., 2019). It is reflected,
however, δ13C from tooth enamel that the entire
diet of an individual, and the data of Roberts et
al., highlights the necessity
of paying more attention to the contribution of plant (and terrestrial
animal) to the diets of humans on tropical islands, especially as those
populations become more established – something that has recently been
urged for the study of the later Lapita expansion in the Pacific
(Maxwell et al., 2016; Tromp
et al., 2020).
The first detailed palaeoenvironmental information for Wallacea in the
Late Pleistocene-Holocene is presented in this study, which is
associated directly with records of human behaviour. It indicates by the
data of Roberts et al. that
the tropical forest environments on Timor remained prevalent throughout
the past 45,000 years, and decreased only in the Late Holocene with the
arrival of deforestation during the Iron Age (Louys et
al., 2018; O’Connor & Aplin,
2007). There is no evidence of C4 grassland environments
being present in the vicinity of any of the sites that were studied. On
Alor, by contrast, C4 resources may have been available to
some small mammals, and presumably to humans as well, during the
earliest period of occupation (40,000 to 21,000 years ago). These
resources disappear as tropical forests expanded across the Terminal
Late Pleistocene-Holocene boundary, while it remains possible that
elevated 13C for some fauna in the early phase represents
consumption of marine resources, this pattern of increasing tropical
forests during the Terminal Pleistocene has also been documented in
other places in Island as well as Mainland Southeast Asia (Rabett,
2012). The expansion of tropical forest during the Terminal Pleistocene
and Early Holocene has also been associated with humans that were
increasingly associated with specialised hunting of arboreal and semi
arboreal mammals and the use of plants from the tropical forests
(Rabett, 2012),
Human colonisation models of Wallacea and Australia suggesting rapid,
initial coastal colonisation that was followed by later inland
settlement (Bird et al.,
2019; Kealy, Louys & O’Connor, 2017), at least with the sites that were
studied here, and is supported by the isotopic evidence of Roberts et
al. This mode of colonisation
is distinct from the isotopic and material evidence from the rainforests
of the Wet Zone of Sri Lanka in the Late Pleistocene (Roberts et
al., 2017; Wedage et
al., 2019) and archaeological
evidence that was recovered from Niah Cavs in Borneo (Barker & Farr,
2016) which indicate dedicated, specialised foraging in tropical forests
by early human populations in these regions that began about 45,000
years ago. This highlights further the potential role of sophisticated
seafaring in the colonisation of eastern Wallacea and Australia by early
humans (Bird et al., 2019;
O’Connor & 2011; Balme, 2013). During the Terminal Pleistocene and Early
Holocene a later, increased focus on terrestrial resources or nearshore
coastal resources has also been argued based on zooarchaeological
evidence from Timor, as well as elsewhere in Island Southeast Asia
(Hawkins et al., 2017;
Boulanger et al., 2019).
Across Wallacea from the Terminal Pleistocene this subsistence pattern
occurs alongside an increase in occupation intensity, as well as an
increase in long distance trading networks that are formalised, and is
likely to be representative of exchange between settled groups in the
region (Reepmeyer et al.,
2019; Shipton et al., 2019).
The adaptive flexibility displayed by humans in the colonisation of
nearly all the continents of the Earth in the Late Pleistocene stands in
stark contrast to the other species of hominin (Rizal et
al., 2020; Roberts & Stewart,
2018; O’Conner et al., 2017;
Roberts & Amano, 2019). Where
present, existing zooarchaeological/palaeontological and
palaeoenvironmental evidence suggests a general, albeit diverse, focus
on mixed grassland and woodland environments, with dispersals and
contractions often relying of environmental change that was climatically
driven (Roberts & Amano, 2019; Brumm et
al., 2016), though there is
some evidence that other hominins made water crossings (Morwood et
al., 2005; Van den Bergh;
2016; Ignicco et al., 2018;
Van den Bergh et al., 2016)
or ventured into high altitude environments (Chen et
al., 2019). In order to test
this distinction, in Wallacea and beyond, requires that isotopic
analysis and more detailed zooarchaeological work in the future be
carried out. There is clear evidence, however, that different
populations of
H. sapiens were able to
specialise in a variety of extreme environments even as humans as a
whole generalised in the use of multiple settings (Roberts & Stewart,
2018). This flexibility that was possibly supported by unique capacities
of innovation and social communication (Boyd, Richardson & Henrich,
2011), enabled adaptation to a variety of conditions, through time as
well as space, that would eventually leave humans as the last hominins
standing.
Roberts, P., et al. (2020). "Isotopic evidence for initial coastal
colonization and subsequent diversification in the human occupation of
Wallacea." Nature Communications 11: 2068.
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
| Author: M.H.Monroe Email: admin@austhrutime.com Sources & Further reading | ||||||||||||||