![]() |
||||||||||||||
|
Australia: The Land Where Time Began |
||||||||||||||
|
Interdecadal Pacific Oscillation and its
Modulation of the ENSO-Precipitation Teleconnection
In this study Westra et al.
evaluate the role of the Interdecadal
Pacific Oscillation
(IPO) in the modulation of the El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO)-precipitation
relationship. Westra et al.
described the standard IPO index together with several alternatives that
were derived by the use of a low-frequency ENSO filter, and their
results indicated that an equivalent IPO index can be obtained as a
low-frequency version of ENSO. Several statistical artefacts arising
from the use of a combination of raw and smoothed ENSO indices in the
modelling of the ENSO-precipitation teleconnection were then discarded.
Included among these artefacts is the identification of a modulation of
a predictor-response relationship by the low frequency version of the
predictor under model misspecification that is potentially spurious.
Westra et al. evaluated the
role of the IPO index in the modulation of the ENSO-precipitation
relationship by the use of a global gridded precipitation dataset which
was based on 3 alternative statistical models: stratified, linear, and
piecewise linear. The information brought by the IPO index is in general
beyond that which is already contained in the Niño-3.4 index, is limited
and statistically not significant. In northeastern Australia there is an
exception using annual precipitation data, and only for the linear
model. A non–linear ENSO-precipitation relationship is induced by
stratification by the IPO index, which suggests that the apparent
modulation by the IPO is likely to be spurious and attributable to a
combination of sample stratification and model misspecification. Westra
et al. say caution is
therefore required when using climate indices that have been smoothed to
model or explain variability in precipitation that is of low frequency.
Conclusions
The outcomes of this study are:
1.
The IPO can be derived as a smoothed version of standard representations
of ENSO;
2.
The apparent modulation is due to a combination of data stratification
and model misspecification, though it is theoretically possible to
spuriously attribute modulation to ENSO-precipitation teleconnection
modulation to the IPO;
3.
It was found, based on observational data of land surface precipitation,
that the information brought by the IPO index, which was beyond the
information that had been already contained in ENSO is quite limited,
and could be explained by the role of stratification and model
misspecification, i.e., assuming a linear model to simulate a nonlinear
predictor response association).
In this paper Westra et al.
focused entirely on the possible modulation of the teleconnection
between ENSO and precipitation by the IPO index; therefore the analysis
doesn’t require assumptions as to whether the ENSO phenomenon itself
exhibits variability of low frequency, and whether this low-frequency
variability is internally forced or is external to the ENSO system.
They also described a number of potential issues that were associated
with the use of the IPO index to model statistically the
ENSO-precipitation relationship, which included the difficulty in
explaining physically the mechanism that is the cause of modulation, and
they also caution against using the IPO index for the prediction of
future precipitation. Westra et
al. do not recommend the IPO index as the basis of statistical
modelling of seasonal or annual precipitation because of the potential
of statistical artefacts when stratifying and using smoothed series to
simulate the ENSO-precipitation relationship, in the absence of the
identification of a physical mechanism for modulation by the IPO of the
ENSO-precipitation relationship.
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
| Author: M.H.Monroe Email: admin@austhrutime.com Sources & Further reading | ||||||||||||||