![]() |
||||||||||||||
Australia: The Land Where Time Began |
||||||||||||||
Juunkan-1 This is an
ironstone Rockshelter that faces south, approximately 25 m wide by 8 m
deep, with a dripline (the lip of the shelter) about 8 m high. Features
of the site are a higher collapsing chamber at the rear and an entrance
area that is open and set at a slightly lower level and the 2 areas are
separated by a lot of roof fall. The rear chamber has a floor that
consists of soft sediment sloping down from the rear. Along the front of
the site flaked stone material has been found, particularly in the
western end of the shelter. The first
excavation at this site was a 1 x 1 m test pit in 2008 in the front
chamber of the Rockshelter. At 75 cm below the surface a solid roof fall
or bedrock was encountered. There were 3 main layers that comprised the
stratigraphy of the test pit: a topsoil of loose material above
brown/grey sediment that was compacted containing many organic finds and
below this a horizon of orange/brown material. At a depth of 40-50 cm
there was a small lens of pink/white soft chalky material, and at the
same depth were small charcoal lenses. The results
of 3 radiocarbon determinations show that the earliest evidence of
discard at Juunkan-1 indicated that discard was occurring at a
conventional radiocarbon date of 32,950 ± 270 BP (Beta 249759) at a
depth of 60 cm. The accumulation of sediment and the discard of
artefacts were very slow until a depth of 35 cm below the surface, which
has been dated to 26,640 ± 160 BP (conventional radiocarbon age)
(Beta-249758). From 35 cm below the surface it is proposed there was a
generally more rapid rate of accumulation that extended to more recent
times near the surface that has been dated to 760 ± 40 BP (conventional
radiocarbon age) (Beta-249757) (740-760 ca. yr. BP).
From Juunkan-1 the
total number of stone artefacts recovered was 32. Spits 1 and 2 (a spit
is a unit of excavation in archaeology) contained the majority of these,
and with only individual artefacts being recovered from lower spits. The
oldest artefact recovered from this site was in spit 14, which was 70 cm
deep, and below the layer that has been dated to 32,920 BP. All the
flaked stone was recovered from the far southeastern corner of the test
square. Slack et
al.
(2009) suggest it is likely that a greater assemblage size will be found
with further planned extensions to the excavations. As well as
flaked stone there were 67 fragments of animal bone recovered from this
site, 57 of which were identifiable. Among the species identified were
bandicoot, kangaroo, wallaroo, native mouse, rat and 1 fragment of fish.
With the exception of spit 9, animal bone from small to large species
were recovered from most spits, with majority of bone being from
medium-large species of macropod. The density of faunal remains is
consistently small, apart from spit 12, where almost 50 % of the bone
was found. All of the bone is highly fragmented and fragments of long
bones accounting for 66 % of the bone that was recovered, followed by
teeth (9 %).
A total of 9 bone
fragments had been burned, of which 2 are calcined, which suggested they
had been deposited in fire for longer periods of time. In addition to
burning, taphonomic analyses have shown several specimens to have
evidence of heavy mineralisation, which is potentially suggestive of
greater time depth. The bone that has been recovered from Juunkan-1
unweathered, and has no post-depositional modifications on the surface
that are obvious, which suggests an
in situ
deposition and rapid burial. Activity of
either humans or carnivores is suggested by the frequency of fragments
of long bone shafts among the faunal assemblage. This assemblage is
believed to have most likely been accumulated by humans as there are no
animal gnaw marks on the surviving bones, together with evidence of
burning from fire. It is difficult to draw conclusions concerning
species utilisation changes and/or frequency diachronically. The extant
faunal evidence, however, suggests both species and element frequencies
remained constant throughout the spits that contained bone, showing no
evidence of diachronic change. Also, spit 12, which associated with the
oldest date (and possibly) with the oldest artefact, and it provides
clearer evidence of early occupation.
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
Author: M.H.Monroe Email: admin@austhrutime.com Sources & Further reading |