![]() |
||||||||||||||
|
Australia: The Land Where Time Began |
||||||||||||||
|
Large Igneous provinces - Essential Criteria –
Distinguish a LIP from a non-LIP LIPs –
Essential attributes Volume A critical attribute is the volume of igneous rocks
that are formed during a magmatic event. The emplacement of very large
volumes of magna on the surface and throughout the profile of the crust,
as well as presumably in the lithospheric mantle, characterise LIPs. The
total volumes can be difficult to constrain, however, for the various
constituents of LIPs, especially as it is only in the youngest LIPs that
the volcanic components are intact, whereas intrusive components from
which the volcanic portions have been removed by erosion dominate older
LIPs. Some parts of the plumbing system can be revealed by regional
geophysics, though the only way in which the distribution of underplated
components at the base of the crust can be revealed is by seismic
studies. Igneous
province classification
·
Giant (LIP)
>107 km3 (>10 Mkm3)
·
Major (LIP)
106-107 km3 (1-10 Mkm3)
·
Substantial
(LIP)
105-106 km3 (0.1-1 Mkm3)
·
Moderate
103-105 km3 (0.001-0.1 Mkm3)
·
Small
≤ 103 km3
(≤0.001 Mkm3) According to Ernst the extrusive and intrusive
components and Underplate of a LIP are fundamentally interrelated, as
exemplified by giant continental dyke swarms feeding flood basalts.
Ernst says he rejects the approach of Sheth (2007), following instead
Bryan & Ernst (2008) in subdividing LIPs into primary volcanic or
plutonic types. For many LIPs from the Mesozoic-Cainozoic the
preserved thicknesses of extrusive rocks range from ~500 m to > 3 km
(e.g. Bryan et al., 2002;
Jerram & Widdowson, 2005; Bryan, 2007), and for any individual section
the thickness is typically ≥ 1 km. Therefore many LIPs have eruptive
and/or subvolcanic intrusive volumes that are well in excess of 1 Mkm3
(Courtillot & Renne, 2003). For LIP-related dyke swarms the average dyke
thickness can be 10-30 m, with extents > 1,000 km, and display an
overall radiating pattern. The thicknesses of LIP-related sills are
10s-100s of m, and associated layered intrusions have volumes of up to
40,000 km3. In this volume Ernst follows the original
definition (Coffin & Eldholm, 1994) as well as the revised definition
(Bryan & Ernst, 2008) to conclude that LIPs should have a minimum
extrusive/subvolcanic intrusive volume that exceeds 0.1 Mkm3.
For the purpose of comparing estimates of LIP volume it is also
important to note whether these estimates include extrusive and
subvolcanic (upper crustal) intrusive volumes, and/or middle and lower
crustal components that have been revealed by geophysical methods (see
also Courtillot & Renne, 2003; Bleeker & Ernst, 2006). Area According to Ernst, given the complexities involved
in determining the volume of LIPs, areal extent is a simpler measure and
there is probably a broad proportionality between LIP volume and the
original areal extent for most events, though there appears to be a
distinctly higher volume to surface area than is the case of continental
LIPs. Ernst suggests a reasonable reconnaissance approach is to draw a
line around all units of a LIP and calculate the areal extent that is
enclosed then convert this to a volume by the use of an “assumed”
thickness of 1 km. The Ontong Java Plateau, e.g., has an area of about 2
Mkm2 which Ernst says is approximately 1-third of the
conterminous USA or equivalent to the area of western Europe. The Columbia River flood-basalt province is the
smallest LIP, that has been recognised, was originally estimated to
cover about 0.16 Mkm2 (Coffin & Eldholm, 1994), has been
subsequently revised upwards to >0.2 Mkm2 (Camp et
al., 2003). For exposed
plumbing systems and intrusive provinces of LIPs, studies have shown
that their areal extents are also consistent with this about 0.1 Mkm2
minimum estimate (e.g. Yale & Carpenter, 1998; Marzoli et
al., 1999; Ernst et
al., 2005). Major regional
continental dyke swarms, so-called giant
dyke swarms, e.g., are >300 km long (Ernst & Buchan, 1997) with typical
extents that also exceed 0.1 Mkm2. The Mackenzie Swarm in
northern Canada, from 1,270 Ma, is the largest (Fahrig, 1987). Many LIPs
are in practice much larger than 0.1 Mkm2. It has been
revealed by a review of several LIPs from the Mesozoic-Cainozoic that
they have areal extents of about 1 Mkm2 (see summary in
Courtillot & Renne, 2003) and many oceanic plateaus also have areas of 1
Mkm2 (Kerr, 2005, 2014), and silicic LIPs (SLIPs) have also
been shown to have dimensions much greater than 0.1 Mkm2
(Bryan et al., 2002; Bryan &
Ernst, 2008). Ernst concluded that while many LIPs have areas greater
than 0.1 Mkm2 it remains useful to keep the cutoff at the
original value of 0.1 Mkm2 to avoid the loss of some LIPs
that have been long-recognised, such as the Columbia River LIP from 17
Ma in North America.
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
| Author: M.H.Monroe Email: admin@austhrutime.com Sources & Further reading | ||||||||||||||