![]() |
||||||||||||||
|
Australia: The Land Where Time Began |
||||||||||||||
|
Magnetic Monopoles in Field Theory and cosmology
Many theories of particle physics beyond the standard model predict the
existence of magnetic monopoles. There has been no experimental or
observational sign of them in spite of extensive searches. In this paper
Rajantie reviewed the role of magnetic monopoles in quantum field theory
and discusses their implications for particle physics and cosmology.
Rajantie also highlights their differences and similarities with
magnetic monopoles found in frustrated magnetic systems.
It is expected, based on experience, that it is not possible to separate
magnetic north from magnetic south into separate magnetic monopoles,
i.e. isolated magnetic charges. Peregrinus discussed this in the 13th
century (Peregrinus, 1904, translated). Nevertheless, there are strong
theoretical reasons to believe that they should exist.
The possibility of free magnetic charges was speculated about in 1894
(Curie, 1894), and magnetic monopoles were used occasionally in
mathematical examples in electrodynamics, though they were only
considered seriously by physicists after it had been shown in 1931 that
if they existed it would explain the quantisation of electric charge
(Dirac, 1931). Magnetic monopoles were shown to exist as nonlinear
objects in many particle physics theories (‘t Hooft, 1974; Polyakov,
1974). They are, in fact, an inevitable prediction of grand unification
of elementary particle interactions (Preskill, 1979) and the same also
applies generally to ‘theories of everything’ that are more modern, such
as superstring theory (Duff, Khuri & Lu, 1995).
According to Rajantie it would be an incredible breakthrough in
high-energy physics to find a magnetic monopole. The properties of
magnetic monopoles are derived from processes taking place at very high
energies, though as they are stable particles and they interact through
the electromagnetic field, they would be relatively easy to study
experimentally. They could, therefore, open up a new window to particle
physics at energies that are out of reach of any foreseeable accelerator
experiments. There have been many unsuccessful attempts to detect them
in different ways (Nakamura et al.,
2010; Giacomelli, Patrizii & Sahnoun, 2011).
Magnetic monopoles have played an important role in theoretical high
energy physics, though they have not been found. Magnetic monopoles have
provided powerful theoretical tools to investigate properties of
strongly coupled non-Abelian gauge field theories, e.g. quantum
chromodynamics (QCD) and especially the supersymmetric variants of it
(Shifman & Yung, 2007). There was an attempt to explain why magnetic
monopoles are apparently absent which led to the formulation of the
theory of cosmological inflation (Guth, 1981), which was confirmed later
by astronomical observations (Komatsu et
al., 2011).
It has recently been discovered that spin ices, frustrated magnetic
systems, have effective quasi-particle excitations that have magnetic
charges (Castelnovo, Moessner & Sondhi, 2008). It appears these
effective monopoles have very similar properties to actual fundamental
magnetic monopoles (Jaubert & Holdsworth, 2009; Bramwell et
al., 2000), which may also
provide a way of learning more about their physics.
This paper was aimed at giving a brief overview of magnetic monopoles in
particle physics. See (Rajantie, 2012) for a more pedagogical
introduction, and for a more detailed review, see (Milton, 2006). There
is also a comprehensive and up-to-date magnetic monopole bibliography
available (Balestra et al.,
2011).
Conclusions
Rajantie says the study of magnetic monopoles has been a great success
as well as a disappointment. Theoretical monopole solutions and the use
of electric-magnetic duality have provided theorists with new ways to
understand the physics of gauge field theories. The theory of inflation,
the cornerstone of modern cosmology, was also led to by the absence of
magnetic monopoles in the Universe.
The discovery recently of effective magnetic monopole quasi-particles in
spin-ices raises the question of whether it could be possible to make
use of them to take these theoretical advances further. Though there are
important difference between fundamental magnetic monopole particles and
the quasi-particles, the quasi-particles behave in many ways as do the
fundamental magnetic monopole particles. Possibly most importantly, the
Dirac strings that connect the monopoles are not completely unphysical.
This does not mean that spin ice experiments cannot be used to draw
conclusions for fundamental monopoles, though the physicist needs to be
aware of the differences between the systems and the limitations they
impose. Rajantie suggests situations in which random thermal
fluctuations play an important role would therefore appear to be most
promising, e.g. studying the formation of monopoles in phase
transitions.
Rajantie, A. (2012). "Magnetic
monopoles in field theory and cosmology." Philosophical
Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and
Engineering Sciences 370(1981): 5705-5717.
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
| Author: M.H.Monroe Email: admin@austhrutime.com Sources & Further reading | ||||||||||||||