![]() |
||||||||||||||
Australia: The Land Where Time Began |
||||||||||||||
Mycorrhizal Networks Facilitate Tree Communication, Learning,
and Memory among Plants
According to Simard it has been increasingly recognised that fungal
networks that link the roots of trees in forests facilitate inter-tree
communication via resource, defence, and recognition of kin signalling
and thereby influence the sophisticated behaviour of neighbours. Simard
suggests that these behaviours of trees have cognitive qualities,
including the capabilities in perception, learning, and memory, and they
influence traits of plants that are indicative of fitness. In this paper
Simard presents evidence that the topology of mycorrhizal networks, with
patterns that are scale-free and small world properties that are
correlated with local and global efficiencies that are important in
intelligence. Moreover, the multiple exploration strategies of
interconnecting fungal species have parallels with fluid and
crystallised intelligence that are important in learning that is
memory-based. The biochemical signals that are transmitted between trees
through fungal linkages are thought to provide resource subsidies to
receivers, particularly among regenerating seedlings, and it appears
that some of these signals have similarities with neurotransmitters.
Simard provides examples of behavioural, memory and learning responses
of neighbouring trees that are facilitated by communication through
fungal networks, including, respectively:
1.
Enhanced survival of understorey seedlings, growth, nutrition and
mycorrhization,
2.
Increased defence chemistry and selection of kin,
3.
Collective interactions among trees, fungi, salmon, bears and people
that enhance the health of the entire forest ecosystem that is
memory-based.
If this evidence is viewed through the lens of tree cognition,
microbiome collaborations, and forest intelligence may contribute to a
more holistic approach to the study of ecosystems and a greater human
empathy and caring for the health of forests.
Plants are not commonly recognised as microbiomes, a place where
villages of collaborative microbes live in and on their roots, stems and
leaves, and form interactive networks (Faust & Raes, 2012; ; van der
Heijden & Hartmann, 2016). These microbial networks are comprised of
fungi, bacteria, archaea, protists, and algae, as well as nematodes,
arthropods, and protozoa (together forming a soil food web), work
together with the plants in complex systems that ae adaptive, to drive
the biochemical cycles of nature and influence every aspect of the
structure and function of ecosystems (Ingham et
al., 1985; Levin, 2005). The
interaction networks are highly coevolved and finely attuned, in such a
way that the loss of subjects from the village, particularly keystone
species, could trigger shifts in the system to alternative states
(Scheffer et al., 2001). The
interaction between microbes and plants is credited with the weathering
of rock and the migration of ancient plants from the ocean to the land
about 360 Ma, and the subsequent evolution of gymnosperm and angiosperm
trees that are highly specialised and ultimately humans, because of the
interaction of microbes and plants being so fundamental to life on Earth
(Margulis, 1981; Humphreys et al.,
Archibald, 2011). The rhizosphere (root-soil interface) is particularly
diverse and active, with plants investing 10-90% of the photosynthetic
products belowground in order to fuel rhizosphere processes that are
involved in the carbon, nutrient, and water cycles, with the smallest
proportion allocated below ground in the tropical forest biome and the
largest in the grassland and tundra biomes (Poorter et
al., 2012). The plant and
microbial inhabiting this rich zone have coevolved sophisticated systems
of communication in order to facilitate their multifarious interactions,
by which information is exchanged between organisms within as well as
among kingdoms (Baluška & Mancuso, 2013). Included in the microbiome of
the rhizosphere (literally “fungus-roots), that are generally
mutualistic and obligate symbioses between root-inhabiting fungi and
plants, which involves 95% of the families of plants (Trappe, 1987).
When plants engage with the fungus they benefit because to invest in
hyphal growth is energetically less expensive than investing in root
growth in order to acquire soil nutrients because complex compounds like
cellulose and lignin are not required, and the growth of hyphae is
faster, have smaller diameters that allows them to access tighter pores
in the soil, and they branch more profusely. Communication between the
plant root apex that is highly active is involved in the development of
mycorrhiza (Darwin’s “root brain”; see Baluška et
al., 2010; Baluška & Mancuso,
2013) and the fungal symbiont, which involves bidirectional elicitor
signal molecules such as auxins, signal perception, signal transduction,
and activation of defence genes (Garcia-Garrido & Ocampo, 2002). The
mycorrhizal fungus exchanges nutrients it has foraged with its
extrametrical mycelium from the soil for photosynthate that has been
fixed by the plant, once the mycorrhizal association has been developed.
The roots and fungal hyphae need to explore large volumes of soil to
acquire the limited and patchy resources, in order to meet the water and
nutrient demands of the plant (Smith & Read, 2008), which involves
cognitive behaviours such as decision-making, search and escape
movements, and recognition of neighbours (Baluška et
al., 2010; Heaton et
al., 2012). The vast majority
of plants would be unable to acquire enough soil nutrients and water to
grow, survive and reproduce, without their mycorrhizal fungal partners.
By forming mycorrhizal networks mycorrhizal fungi can link the roots of
different plant hosts (Molina & Horton, 2015). It is considered that
mycorrhizal networks are common across biomes because most mycorrhizal
symbioses are generic, where a species of plant associates with a
diverse suite of species of fungus, or, conversely, a fungal species
colonises many species of plants. Of these associations, some are highly
specialised, however,
where some plant and fungal species associates with only a single
partner species, with the potential to form exclusive, conspecific
networks (Molina et al.,
1992). Heterospecific or conspecific networks of ectomycorrhizal fungi
in forests form among gymnosperms and some angiosperm trees as well as
wood shrubs in temperate and boreal forest biomes, whereas arbuscular
fungi networks (AMF) form mainly among angiosperm trees as well as many
herbs and grasses (e.g., Cupressaceae and Aceraceae) in the tropical
forest biome, though some conifers are also included with the (Smith &
Read, 2008). Basidiomycota and Ascomycota predominantly include
ectomycorrhizal fungi, and they are characterised by a fungal sheath
surrounding the root tip, a Hartig net that envelops the plant host root
cell wall, and extrametrical mycelia, whereas the endomycorrhizal AMF
are found predominantly in the Glomeromycota phylum, and these form
arbuscules and sometimes vesicles inside the host plant root cells.
There are some exceptional plant families and genera that can form
viable symbioses with EMF and AMF simultaneously (e.g.,
Salicaceae, Eucalyptus)
and serve as key hubs that link ectomycorrhizal and arbuscular
mycorrhizal networks (Molina & Horton, 2015), There are other
endomycorrhizal classes that include ericoid mycorrhizal fungi on
autotrophic plant species in the Ericaciae plant family, arbutoid
mycorrhizas on autotrophic plants in the Ericaciae subfamily
Arbutoideae, monotropoid mycorrhizas on the Monotropoideae subfamily of
the Ericaciae, as well as several genera of the Orchidaceae, and orchid
mycorrhizas on heterotrophic orchids.
It is increasingly understood that plants, including trees, have
cognitive capacity for perceiving, processing, and communicating with
other plants, organisms, and the environment and to remember and use
information to learn, adjust their behaviours, and to adapt accordingly
(Gagliano, 2014). To put it another way, plants are being increasingly
recognised as having agency that leads to decisions and actions, which
are characteristics that are usually associated with intelligence that
is usually ascribed to humans or perhaps animals (Brenner et
al., 2006). This recognition
that plants have agency and actions, in their capacity to perceive,
communicate, remember, learn and behave, could be transformative for how
humans perceive, emphasize and with, and care for trees and the
environment.
It is known that trees perceive and communicate with each other and
other plants through root pathways (Baluška et
al., 2010; Bierdrzycki et
al., 2010) or using airborne
signals (Heil & Karban, 2009). Also, they can recognise the identity of
neighbouring plants and whether they are related genetically through
root exudates (Bierdrzycki et al.,
2010) of mycorrhizas (Pickles et
al., 2016). It has been proposed (Baluška & Mancuso, 2013) that
within- and between plant communication is accomplished primarily via
transport of signals within and between roots, where compounds such as
auxins act as neurotransmitters across synapses at cell cross-walls
within roots, across synapses between apices of apices of roots of
different plants and symbiotic microbes and fungi in the rhizosphere. It
was proposed by Simard that all trees are mycorrhizal in nature between
trees most belowground communication is mediated by mycorrhizas and that
mycorrhizal networks are involved intimately in the communication of
trees. This follows closely on the recognition by Baluška and Mancuso
(2013) that communication between plants, and the involvement of
cell-to-cell synapse and compounds that are like neurotransmitters, has
coevolved with microorganisms. Yet, much of the historic research on
plant communication and cognition has been conducted on plants that are
non-mycorrhizal that were grown in the lab and has not reported on the
role of mycorrhizal fungi. The present review seeks to help set the
stage for more holistic view of various aspects of plant cognition by
involving their mycorrhizas in nature.
The aim of this chapter is to review the fundamental role of mycorrhizal
networks in communication between trees, and the functional, ecological,
and evolutionary significance of this communication to forest
communities in nature. Existing experimental evidence for cognition
among trees, which is facilitated by mycorrhizas, will be reviewed by
Simard, and showcase examples from the research in her lab. Simard’s
hope is that this might lead to an integrated approach to the study of
plant cognition in natural ecosystems that include plant microbiomes.
Evidence for Tree cognition that is facilitated by mycorrhizas
Perception, agency and action are required by cognition in plants, as
well as the complex adaptive behaviours that are triggered by it for
enhanced fitness (Gagliano et al.,
2014). Scientists working in the field of plant cognition have
effectively provided scientific evidence and argued for neuronal aspects
of plants, though cognition and intelligence are usually considered to
be exclusively the domain of humans and possibly animals based on the
presence of their central nervous system. Included in this are the
existence of cross walls in plant cells, plasmodesmata, and synapses at
the apices of roots, which are analogous to neural synapses; signalling
molecules that cross these synapses and transmit information via
exocytosis via calcium that is regulated by calcium and vesicles
recycling to neighbouring cells, similar to neurotransmitters; and
action potential that rapidly transmit electrochemical signals in order
to control plant physiology
and behaviours, in a similar way to a nervous system (Baluška et
al., 2005). This concept was
extended (Baluška et al.,
2005) to include cells of microbes that are in association with plants
such as bacteria and fungi, where adjacent of interfacing plasma
membranes form immunological synapses with plant cell membranes and
molecules cross from plant-cell to microbe-cell, as occurs in the trade
of carbon and nutrient molecules across the plant-fungal membranes in
mycorrhizas. This neuronal physiology is used by trees and plants to
then perceive the affordances of their environment (Gagliano, 2014)
through multiple sensory organs, which include leaves, roots and
microbiome (Karban et al.,
2014; Bierdrzycki et al.,
2010; van deer Heijden & Hartmann, 2016).
The position that plant cognition is sophisticated and intelligent
(e.g., good at making decisions, planning, organising behaviours,
solving problems, etc.) is questioned because of the absence of a brain,
with its vast system of neurons, neurotransmitters, and action
potentials that are organised as nodes and links in a complex modular
neural network, that is now considered to be fundamental to neural
plasticity, flexibility, and therefore intelligence (Brenner et
al., 2006; Gagliano et
al., 2014; Barbey, 2017). It
was controversially proposed by Charles and Francis Darwin, with their
“root-brain” hypothesis that the root apex, which is located between the
apical meristem and the elongation zone of a root tip, acts like a
brain-like organ that controls plant behaviour, as occurs in animals
(Darwin, 1880). Support for this hypothesis with the existence of
“animal-like sensory-motoric circuits which allow adaptive behaviour”
such as root crawling and plant tropism, is supported by Baluška (2009).
In the view of Simard, however, the “root-brain” hypothesis on it own
cannot explain adequately the sophisticated behaviours of plants that
are observed in roots because, by the nature of the nature of their
constitution of cellulose, which is energy-expensive, they lack the
degree of flexibility that is needed to develop rapidly
new
transient pathways for tackling unique problems. Moreover, the
“root-brain” hypothesis does not fit adequately with the new network
neuroscience which is showing that general intelligence (g) arises from
the existence of both “crystallised intelligence” (similar to memory)
that results from strong, well-worn pathways that overlap (or bonds)
that access network states that are easy to reach, as well as “fluid
intelligence” (similar to learning) that results from weaker pathways
that are more transient and access network states that are difficult to
reach (Barbey, 2017). Simard posits, in order to help complete the
picture, that when plants enter into symbiosis with mycorrhizal fungi,
this provides them with the necessary topology and energetics for
sophisticated intelligence.
Topology of mycorrhizal networks
In a communication network topology refers to the arrangement of the
various elements (nodes, links). In the human brain, nodes and links
could be the neurons and axons they could be trees and interconnecting
mycorrhizal fungal mycelia in a forest. How freely nodes interact with
each other is determined by the topology of the network; how intense,
frequent, or efficient their interactions are and how vulnerable or
resilient the network is to the loss of specific nodes or groups of
nodes, modules, (Bascompte, 2009). It is shown by network neuroscience
that the general intelligence (g) is correlated with the architecture of
the neural network that is scale-free (The distribution of links per
node follows a power-law, where there are a few nodes that are highly
connected (i.e., hubs) and many nodes that are connected weakly) with
small-world properties (cliquish, with frequent strong links within
cliques) (Barbey, 2017). The topology of the scale-free network
contrasts with the random or regular networks, in which are distributed
more equally among nodes. Global efficiencies that have high local
clustering (hubs, cliques, modules) and short path lengths (distance
between distal nodes or clusters, are balanced by this architecture
which allows connections that are low-cost and short-distance as well as
shortcuts via hops and skips among distal nodes, modules, or cliques
that promote the processing of global processing information (Bray,
2003). In the human brain modules or cliques can be thought of as
cortexes and lobes (e.g., frontal, temporal, parietal, etc.). Modules
could be clusters of trees in forests, different species or functional
groups of species; or from a fungal perspective, they could be fungal
species or functional groups such as exploration types. Types of
exploration, that include long distance, short distance, and contact are
distinguished based on the amount hyphae that emanate or the presence
and differentiation of rhizomorphs and are considered to be important in
assessing the diversity of soil substrates that are needed to supply
trees with adequate nutrition (Agerer, 2001). They are also important to
modes of resource transmission through mycorrhizal networks (Teste et
al., 2009; Hobbie & Agerer,
2010). Modules are interconnected in either brains or mycorrhizal
networks. Albeit less frequently than within modules, modules are
interconnected by axons and mycorrhizal fungi.
This modular characteristic in modular scale-free networks allows for
specialised information processing while small-world properties allow
for global and local efficiency and flexibility in learning that is
memory-based. The presence of modules and hubs that are connected
strongly supports linkage, nestedness and short path lengths among modes
that are important in mobilisation of crystallised knowledge (i.e.,
memory) for learning. On the other hand the network is left vulnerable
to loss of key hubs (e.g., local injury to a brain lobe, high-grade
logging, or pathological selection of the largest trees in a forest).
The presence of nodes that are linked weakly (e.g., frontoparietal or
singular-opercular networks of patches of small trees that are
regenerating in gaps in the forest), by contrast, supports small-world
topology that is globally efficient, access to states that are difficult
to reach, and rapid active behaviour in novel situations (rapid
learning) (Barbey, 2017). Weak linkages in brains can develop through
rapid growth of synaptic connections between neurons and myelination of
nerve fibres, and these are strengthened by pruning in response to
environmental conditions, which represents learning (Craik & Bialystok,
2006). Weak linkages develop rapidly via expansion of the cell at
growing mycelia fronts, where the growth of the apical tip, branching
and anastomosis, and the colonisation of new plants occur; it is thought
that this is accomplished predominantly by contact or short-distance
explorer species of ectomycorrhizal fungi (Agerer, 2006; Hobbie &
Agerer, 2010; Heaton et al.,
2012). As in learning, this mycelium is very active, dynamic and
adaptive to simultaneously grow, prune and regress in response to the
environment that is changing rapidly. As well as exploiting resources
over short distances, they also grow over long distances in order to
reach distant patches of resources or to form connections with distant
mycorrhizal plants or modules (Agerer et
al., 2006; Lilleskov et
al., 2011). They are capable
of high-volume transfer of resources that is rapid and efficient
(Agerer, 2006). The long distance exploration rhizomorphs can be thought
of as analogous to “crystallised intelligence” and the mycelial front
that is expanding rapidly of short-distance and contact explorers as
“fluid intelligence.” According to (Barbey 2017), it is shown by
neuroscience research that this kind of scale-free network topology
provides the greatest flexibility and dynamics that are crucial to
learning and intelligence. Neural networks are also shown to have the
flexibility to transition between topologies, e.g., from scale-free to
regular topology that is associated with cognitive abilities that are
more specific and or towards a random topology that is associated with
cognitive abilities more random topology that is associated with
broader, more general abilities. It is also shown by recent research in
forest ecosystems that mycorrhizal networks can transition from
scale-free to regular and back to scale-free topology with the
harvesting and planting of trees and subsequent stand development (van
Dorp, 2016). The diverse intelligence that is present among humans and
forests is likely to underlie this dynamic flexibility.
In forest stands mycorrhizal network topology, where trees are modelled
as nodes and fungal hyphae that are interconnecting as links, is
strikingly to the topology of neural networks in human brains
(Southworth et al., 2005;
Lian et al., 2006; Beiler et
al., 2010, 2015; Toju et
al., 2014). Multi-locus,
microsatellite DNA markers were used in Beiler et
al., (2010, 2015), to show
that in even-aged forests of Douglas-fir
Pseudotsuga menziesii
most trees of Douglas-fir var.
glauca were
interconnected by mycorrhizal networks of 2 ectomycorrhizal fungi,
Rhizopogon vesiculosus
and
R. vinicolor. These 2
Rhizopogon species share
narrow host specificity for Douglas-fir (Kretzer et
al., 2003), and they dominate
the diverse community of 65 mycorrhizal species of fungi that occur at
all stages of a forest stand
development (Twieg et al.,
2007). Species of
Rhizopogon fruit in
truffles below ground and have coralloid or tuberculate structures and
have fine, dark extrametrical hyphae that are capable of growing rapidly
over short distances and form rhizomorphs that are highly differentiated
that are capable of transporting water and dissolved nutrients over long
distances (Brownlee et al.,
1983; Molina, 2013). Simard found that short-distance hyphae and
long-distance rhizomorphs of
R. vesiculosus and
R. vinicolor colonised
trees of all sizes and ages forming complex networks that are spatially
continuous that link multiple trees in a forest together (Beiler et
al., 2012.
The
Rhizopogon-Douglas-fir
mycorrhizal network had a network structure that was scale-free with
small-world properties, and had a few large old hub trees that had the
greatest number of fungal connections and were connected to many small,
young trees that had fewer connections (Beiler et
al., 2010, 2015). Given that
the rooting density of mycorrhizal root tips and potential for
connections is correlated with the size of a tree, this architecture
makes sense. A single hub tree in a 30 x 30 m patch in one of the
stands, was linked to 47 other trees and was estimated to be linked to
at least 250 more trees had the larger stand been sampled. An extensive
network in which nearly all of the smaller and younger understory
seedlings and saplings had established was provided by the veteran hub
trees. In the network, the high clustering suggested that the old hub
trees provided network paths or hyperlinks that bridged the cliques
(modules) of the densely connected younger trees. It was allowed by
these pathways for the entire network to be traversed easily, which is a
small-world property. The high density of the fungal links within
patches (modules) indicated that the patches were resilient to random
disturbances, though also vulnerable to attacks that target hubs. The
linkages of the
R. vinicolor were smaller
and nested within the larger,
R. vesiculosus network,
so formed a cliquish, nested “meta-network”, and network resilience was
increased by this nestedness. The density and complexity of the network
is without doubt vastly more complex than Simard was able to describe,
given that she accounted for only 2 of the 65 ectomycorrhizal species in
the forest, and they did not examine the arbuscular, ericoid, arbutoid,
or orchidoid subnetworks that were associated with other tree and
understory plant species that would have been nested within the
Rhizopogon network.
Communication through mycorrhizal networks
According to Simard the scale-free, small-world network topology of the
mycorrhizal network is designed for efficiency – for shuttling signals
that operate rapidly through
links among numerous trees, which includes between old hubs and young
nodes, and for minimising the costs of this transmission of information
while maximising the impact on growth and adaption of the network
(Barbey, 2017). The many experiments that were carried out by Simard
found that a multitude of signals, which include nitrogen, carbon,
water, defence molecules, and the recognition of kin information, are
transmitted back and forth among Douglas-fir trees through mycorrhizal
networks (for a review see Simard et
al., 2015).
·
Phosphorus (Eason et al.,
1991; Finlay & Read, 1986; Perry et
al., 1989),
·
other defence signals (Song et al.,
2010; Babikova et al., 2013),
·
allelochemicals (Barto et al.,
2011),
·
nutrient analogues (Meding & Zasoki, 2008),
·
Gyuricza et al., 2010),
·
And genetic material (Giovannettti et
al., 2004, 2005)
have also been shown to be transmitted through arbuscular networks or
among different mycorrhizal plants in other studies. These compounds can
be large of small and can include fungal carbohydrates (e.g., trehalose,
mannitol, arabitol, and erythritol, see below), amino acids (e.g.,
glutamine and glycine), lipids, nitrogen ions (NH4+
or NO3-), phosphates, and nuclei (Martin et
al., 1986; Smith & Smith,
1990; Bago et al., 2002;
Giovannettti et al., 2005;
Nehls et al., 2007). It has
also been shown that phytohormones such as jasmonates, signals that are
important in regulating the mycorrhizal symbiosis as well as plant
phenotype plasticity, converge in mycorrhizal hubs (Pozo et
al., 2015). Most of these
signals are shuttled rapidly within and between plants, within hours or
a few days, and they are of sufficient magnitude to influence behaviours
of plants such as the foraging of roots, acquisition of nutrients,
growth, or survival (Simard et al.,
2012). Signalling between plants could occur even faster and more
efficiently via the transmission of sound (Gagliano, 2012) through
mycorrhizal networks, much like a conversation over the telephone, but
this mode of communication has not yet been explored in mycorrhizal
networks.
Simard believes that the transmission of signals or resources or
molecules or sounds between plants through mycorrhizal networks
constitutes communication. For the word communication the Latin root is
“communicat” or share, and it is the communication or sharing of
information by way of a common system of signals that benefits the
sender as well as the receiver. Interplant sharing of information, as
argued by Gagliano (2012) is now accepted widely among scientists as a
form of communication between plants. Moreover, that signals that are
communicated constitute a language, where signalling is communication
(Gagliano & Grimonprez, 2015). Words that are spoken or written, sounds,
signals or gestures used to communicate and are used by individuals,
whether by human, animal, or plant, to make sense of and to survive in
their world, can be included in language. The chemistry or sound that is
transmitted by plants is, in this sense, their language, and by analogy,
the highly varied compounds or sound waves emitted constitute their
vocabulary. According to Simard this language that has emerged from
local repeated interactions among plants, fungi or other organisms, and
the environment, which led to increased fitness of the species by
enhancement of their adaptive capacity, capability to learn, and
ultimately to coevolution (Gagliano & Grimonprez, 2015). It allows
plants to adjust plastically to environmental challenges in their
environment, and their associated microbiota enhances this ability.
Signals that have been transmitted cell-to-cell and tree-to-tree through
mycorrhizal networks can be thought of as being analogous to
neurotransmitters in biological neural networks. Some of the amino acids
and phytohormones that are transmitted through mycorrhizal networks are
analogous, structurally, to neurotransmitter transporters that are
highly conserved in humans and animals (Wipf et
al., 2002; Baluška et
al., 2005). E.g.:
·
Auxin is similar, structurally, to serotonin (Pelagio-Flores et
al., 2011; Baluška & Mancuso,
2013).
·
Glutamate is the most abundant excitatory neurotransmitter in the
central nervous system and accounts for more than 90% of transmissions
in the human brain.
·
Glycine is the most common inhibitory transmitter and is highly active
in the brain and spinal cord (Bowery & Smart, 2006).
·
Glutamate and glycine are the primary amino acids through which amino
acids are transferred from ectomycorrhizal fungi to their hosts (Martin
et al., 1986; Taylor et
al., 2004; and through which
nitrogen and carbon are thought to transfer along source-link gradients
through mycorrhizal networks (Martin et
al., 1986; Teste et
al., 2009, 2010; Deslippe &
Simard, 2011; Simard et al.,
et al., 2015; Deslippe et
al., 2016).
These signals, the amino acids, hormones, as well as other compounds
constitute the language of plants, through the interlinking mycorrhizal
hyphae and rhizomorphs of the network simplistically and apoplastically,
crossing plant and fungal synapses and following source-link gradients
among nodes of trees and plants (Simard et
al., 2015). It is likely that
photosynthetic activity in leaves generates nitrogen and carbon
source-sink gradients within donor plants that drive the transport of
amino acids into the mycorrhizal roots, which is followed by their
transmission by way of mass flow through the interconnecting mycelium
and then up into the xylem of the linked receiver sink plants. 5 carbon
atoms are contained in glutamine for every 2 nitrogen atoms, and glycine
contains 2 to 1, which reflects the high-energy cost of nitrogen
assimilation by plants (Martin et
al., 1986; Taylor et al.,
2004). The plant would receive a significant carbon subsidy additionally
to nitrogen, while the fungus would still receive carbon, its most
limiting resource from the plant, when glutamine and glycine are
delivered in high quantities from the mycelium to the plant (Yang et
al., 2010). Dual isotope
labelling with 13C and 15N was used (Teste et
al., 2009) in order to show
that Douglas-fir saplings were rich in nitrogen transferred carbon and
nitrogen simultaneously to conspecific germinantes that were nitrogen
and carbon poor through mycorrhizal networks and that this corresponded
with greater 2-year survival of receiver seedlings. The relative amounts
of N (0.0018%) and C (0.0063% of photo-assimilate) that was transferred
had a stoichiometry of (2N:7C), and this is similar to glutamine
(2N:5C), alanine and cysteine (2N:6C), though in that study the
compounds that were transferred were not identified (Teste et
al., 2009). Some of these
amino acids (glutamate, cysteine) activate postsynaptic cells in the
central nervous system, while others (glycine. Alanine) depress the
activity of postsynaptic cells (Dehaene et
al., 2003). These compounds
are involved in basic metabolism in plants, such as regulating the
transport of ions, modulating the opening of stomates, the synthesis of
enzyme and protein, gene expression etc. (Rai, 2002). The regulation of
communication between plants involves plant nodes as well as fungal
links. According to supply and demand and stress gradients in the plant
communities, which represents a complex underground trading system,
resources and signals are transmitted back and forth between plants
through the fungal networks. This trading of information is similar to a
conversation in which 2 or more plants and the fungi exchange
information in a local setting. Patterns of transmission of C, N and
water, as well as other information, depends on source-link gradients
that are governed by factors such as physiological, status of nutrients
or water of the donor or receiver plants, stress gradients within the
plant community, degree of dependency of these plants on mycorrhization,
the species of fungi that are involved in the network, or the status of
water or nutrients of patchy soil environments. It has been shown by
many experiments that differences in physiological source-link strength
or stress among pants (such as in rates of photosynthesis, rates of
growth, nutrient content, age, defoliation by pathogens, insects or
drought) influence patterns of transmission (Simard & Durall, 2004;
Leake et al., 2004; Selosse
et al., 2006; van der Heijden
& Horton, 2009; Song et al.,
2010). Characteristics of associations of fungi and associated microbial
communities also play important roles (Finlay et
al., 2009; Rygiewicz &
Anderson, 1994; Lehto & Zwiazek, 2011). Experimental inoculation with
different fungal species supports the importance of mycorrhizal fungi to
interplant communication (Arnebrant et
al., 1993; Ekblad & Huss-Danell,
1995; Ek et al., 1996; He et
al., 2004, 2005;
Edgerton-Warburton et al.,
2007; Querejeta, 2012) and the use of mesh that allows certain fungal
exploration type to join the network (Teste et
al., 2009; Bingham & Simard,
2012).
Plant behavioural responses, learning and memory
Changes in the morphology and physiology of plants in response to
environmental stimuli are plant behaviour and learning that flow from
the agents of cognition, which include senses, mycorrhizal networks and
the transmission of signals are described above. Plants are provided
with sophisticated mechanisms for perceiving their environment, storing
this information in their memory banks, such as annual growth rings,
seeds, or branching, rooting and network topologies, and making use of
this information for memory-based learning that drives behaviours such
as choice, decision making, defence and the recognition of neighbours.
Communication that occurs between plants trough mycorrhizal networks,
e.g., has been associated with shifts in behaviour that are expressed in
patterns of rooting, development of mycorrhizal networks, the uptake of
nutrients, and the production of defence enzymes. Changes in survival,
growth and fitness of the sender and receiver plants, have resulted from
these shifts. Behaviour has been described (McNickle et
al., 2009) has been defined
as the expression of plasticity of the plant that is like a decision
point, at which each choice involves trade-offs that will affect
fitness. Plant behaviours that have been influenced by the transmission
of signals between plants through mycorrhizal networks include, i.e.,
changes in:
1.
Plant morphology such as the depth of rooting, height of growth, or
patterns of mycorrhizal networks;
2.
Plant physiology such as rates of photosynthesis, stomatal conductance,
and uptake of nutrients; and
3.
Plant fitness indicators such as germination, survival, and gene
regulation of defence chemistry.
Previous reviews have well described these behavioural changes, which
include (Selosse et al.,
2006; Simard et al., 2012,
2013, 2015; Gorzelak et al.,
2015; and Horton, 2015). In this paper Simard has summarised briefly
only those that have been associated with transmission between plants as
carbon, nitrogen and water through mycorrhizal networks.
Substantial flows of carbon occur through mycorrhizal networks and they
vary with the degree of heterotrophy of the plants; supplying up to 10%
of autotrophic, up to 85% of partial mycoheterotrophic, and 100% of
mycoheterotrophic plant carbon. This supplying of carbon has been
associated with increased survival and growth of autotrophic plants, and
it is essential for the survival of plants that are fully heterotrophic.
E.g., the success of seedling establishment in their Douglas-fir forests
was significantly greater where the seedlings had full access of
mycorrhizal networks of older Douglas-fir trees compared with where they
did not (Teste et al., 2009;
Bingham & Simard, 2012). Access to the network of older trees improved
the survival of conspecific seedlings, but seedlings were colonised by a
fungal community that was more complex, comprising multiple short- and
long-distance exploration types. As a result of their ability to nurture
the seedlings of the understorey, many of which were related (see
below), that they were named the old hub trees “mother trees” (Simard,
2012). Network mediated fluxes of nitrogen from plants that fix N2
have supplied up to 40% of receiver nitrogen N2 to
non-nitrogen fixing plants, and this has been associated with increased
productivity (e.g., He et al.,
2003, 2005, 2009). Fluxes between trees that do not fix N2
have supplied <5% of receiver N (He et
al., 2006; Teste et
al., 2009). The hydraulic
distribution of soil and plant water following water potential
gradients, which included forests of Douglas-fir, is also facilitated by
ectomycorrhizal networks, which supply up to 50% of plant water that is
essential for the survival and growth of plants (see Simard et
al., 2015).
Learning
When plants perceive their environment and use this information to
modify their behaviour in order to optimise their resources to increase
fitness, learning occurs. This can involve social learning, trial and
error, cultural transmission and epigenetics (Gagliano, 2014). Simard
provides 2 examples of social learning that is network-mediated and
epigenetics in plants that involves the recognition of kin and defence
signalling, which was described previously in Gorzelak et
al. (2015).
Plants can use a process called kin recognition to recognise degrees of
relatedness of neighbouring plants, then they change their behaviour in
order to interact optimally with these neighbours, learn to respond to
concurrent changes in the behaviour of their neighbours, and in this way
increase their fitness (Dudley & File, 2008; Karban & Shiojiri, 2009;
Novoplansky, 2009; Dudley et al.,
2013; Asay, 2013; Gorzelak, 2017). It has been shown in several
experiments that kin recognition is mediated by mycorrhizas or
mycorrhizal networks (File et al.,
2012a, b: Asay, 2013; Pickles et
al., 2016; Gorzelak, 2017). E.g., foliar nutrition improved in
AMF
Ambrosia artemisiifolia
when it was integrated into a mycorrhizal network with plants that were
related but not with conspecific strangers (File et
al., 2012a, b). Similarly, in
Douglas-fir seedlings that were grown in greenhouse conditions, growth
attributes and foliar micronutrients were increased in kin compared with
strangers that were grown with older conspecifics (Asay, 2013).
Mycorrhizal colonisation in both cases was elevated in related but not
in strangers that were not related, which led to increased growth and
nutrition of both seedlings in the pair (File et
al., 2012a, b; Asay, 2013).
It was revealed by these findings that
mycorrhizas and mycorrhizal networks can play an integral role in
kin recognition and that learning from increased mycorrhization enhanced
the plant morphological and physiological responses. It is not yet
clear, however, exactly the mechanism by which kin recognition occurs.
There is, nevertheless, strong evidence that biochemical signals that
are derived from mycorrhizas or roots are involved (Bierdrzycki et
al., 2010; Semchenko et
al., 2007). It was shown by (Semchenko
et al. 2007) e.g., that
specific information was carried by root exudates about the genetic
relatedness, origin of population, and the species identity of
neighbours, and different root behaviour responses of neighbours to
locally applied exudates. Included in this was increased density of
roots, which was achieved by morphology rather than allocation of
biomass, which suggests that plants learned from their neighbours to
limit the energetic costs of their behaviour. Any root exudates that are
involved in kin recognition are likely to be filtered through
mycorrhizal fungi and mycorrhizal networks, because the overwhelming
majority of plants are predominantly mycorrhizal
in situ, and because
mycorrhizal networks are considered to be common in nature. Simard found
in a recent study that used stable-isotope probing that mycorrhizal
networks transmitted more carbon from older donor Douglas-fir seedlings
to the roots of younger kin than to stranger receiver seedlings, which
suggests there is a fitness advantage to neighbours that are genetically
related (Pickles et al.,
2016). The greater mycorrhizal colonisation of kin than stranger
seedlings (Asay, 2013), which formed a stronger sink in the mycorrhizal
network, an effect that is also noted in this study by File et
al. (2012a, b). It was later
found (Gorzelak et al., 2017)
that herbivory in Douglas-fir induced greater transfer of carbon through
mycorrhizal networks to neighbouring kin than to stranger seedlings.
Rapid behavioural responses of recipient plants also result from defence
signals that travel through mycorrhizal networks and this is evident in
sudden changes that occur in foliar defence chemistry (Babikova et
al., 2013; Song et
al., 2015) and resistance to
pests (Song et al., 2010,
2014). Broad beans
Vicia faba, for instance,
respond to attack by transferring defence signals rapidly through
mycorrhizal networks to neighbouring bean plants, which learnt from this
to produces chemicals that repel aphids and attract predators of aphids
(Babikova et al., 2013). This
learning represents a trophic cascade that is generated by infestation
by pests and signal propagation through mycorrhizal networks. From these
triggers the ponderosa pine learned to increase the production of
defence enzyme and protect itself against the loss of healthy hosts. It
was shown in earlier studies (Song et
al., 2010, 2014), that
increases in the production of enzyme that were mycorrhizal-mediated
flowed from defence genes that were upregulated and modification of gene
expression, constituted an epigenetic effect. Larger generational-scale
changes in the behaviour of plant-symbiont systems are led to by
responses to pest infestation, Shifts in the composition of
ectomycorrhizal communities that were caused by a variety of factors,
such as mortality of hosts (e.g., outbreaks of pine beetle; Kurz et
al., 2008), can result in
ecological memory effects that impact future generations of the host
species (Karst et al., 2015).
E.g., in areas of western North America that was dramatically impacted
by pine dieback of lodgepole pine (Pinus
contorta), that was induced by mountain pine beetles, EMF have
declined significantly (Treu, et
al., 2014). Seedlings that were grown in soils from pine stands that
were attacked by the beetle learned from this decline had then expressed
reduced biomass, as well as reducing the production of monoterpenes
compared with those that had been grown in soil from pine stands that
had not been disturbed. It was revealed by this that a transgenerational
cascade that involved learning, memory and epigenetics that were
mediated by fungal symbionts had occurred (Karst et
al., 2015).
Memory
Memory is a process by which organisms acquire, encode, store and
retrieve information. This information can then form the basis for
experimental learning, in which organisms modify their actions to
improve fitness. An example of memory based learning is emerging from
the new research of Simard on the salmon forests of the Pacific coast.
According to Simard they are now studying how “mother trees”, the
ancient cedars, spruces and firs of the Pacific coast, transmit
nutrients through their massive fungal networks through the forest, to
feed the entire ecosystem. The way it works, as explained by Simard, is
that salmon eggs hatch in freshwater streams of the coastal forests, and
then the fry swim down the rivers to the sea where they spend their
adult lives feeding in the open ocean. Every spring and autumn the
salmon return to their mother streams where they lay their eggs, after
which they die; their bodies then release the nutrients they brought
from the ocean. The salmon are used by the Aboriginal people of the
Pacific coast for their livelihood, traditionally building stone tidal
traps at the mouths of the marine spawning rivers to catch the fish
passively. As well as humans, other predators and scavengers such as
grizzlies, wolves, and eagles, also feed on the dead fish. They carry
their catch into the forest to eat them under the mother trees of the
riparian forest. When they do this the nutrients in the fish are
deposited in the forest in the form of decaying remains, faeces and
urine. The bears eat the innards and leave the remainder of the fish to
decay
and the nutrients seep into the soil. The mycorrhizal fungi that
are associated with the tree and other plant roots acquire the salmon
nutrients from the soil and thereby supply 25-90% of the nitrogen
budgets of the trees and plants. When the salmon nutrients are
metabolised in the woody tissues of the trees, the salmon nutrients are
stored in tree rings for centuries, which provides a memory bank of
historical salmon runs for as long as the tree is old. As a result of
this process, the nutrients contribute to the more rapid growth of trees
along the salmon streams, and underlies the great size and productivity
of these old forests, which are unparalleled. It has also been shown to
shape the diversity and composition of vegetation, insect and bird
communities (Hocking and Reynolds, 2011). A memory embedded in the
forest is constituted of this process uptake of salmon nutrients by the
mycorrhizas, storage in tree rings, and retrieval of the information for
tree growth. According to Simard they are now examining whether these
salmon nutrient memories are transmitted from tree to tree from plant to
plant through their connections by fungal mycorrhizas, deep into the
forest. The spreading of the salmon memory, the telling of their story
through their networks of communication, allows the trees, fungi, bears,
and salmon to inform the productivity and health of the ecosystem
collaboratively. In turn, these luxurious forests shade and nurture the
salmon rivers, modulate the temperatures of the water and transmit
nutrients to the ebb tides by way of seepage, thereby forming a possible
feedback loop that promotes the health and productivity of the fish. The
Aboriginal people of the Pacific west use the bark and roots, which
contain the nitrogen from salmon, to make clothing, art and tools, such
as are used to harvest the salmon. The mother trees have a crucial role
in the closing of this circle. Therefore, the health of the forest is
tied to the health of the salmon, and it cycles back to the rivers,
ocean and the people. The integrity of this circle of life is dependent
on what the people call reciprocity – the trade of mutual respect.
According to Simard this is an example of how the people are embedded
sustainably in this complex adaptive system.
The community may be allowed to solve the cognitive problems that go
beyond the capacity of a single organism, facilitating altruistic
behaviours such as kin recognition and more generally promoting
cooperation for better health of the ecosystem by collective behaviour,
learning and memory in the salmon forest.
Conclusions
This chapter has provided evidence that mycorrhizal networks are crucial
agents in tree and plant perceptions, of their neighbours and their
environment, in interpreting communication of their strengths, needs and
stresses, in the acquisition and storage of memories and in learning
that is memory based and behaviours that are adaptive. The scale-free
topology and small-world properties of mycorrhizal networks, as well as
similarities in signals that are transmitted by neurotransmitters in
vertebrates, provide the necessary biological agency for intelligence in
forests. Manyfold opportunities for trees to take action for interacting
with their neighbours and adapting to the environment that is changing
rapidly are provided by agency and conveyance of information through the
mycorrhizal network. Trees and plants are more perceptive, intelligent,
and in control of their destiny than they have ever been given credit
for by humans, through sophisticated cognition that is facilitated by
their microbiome. Simard has stated that it her hope that the crucial
role played by plant biomes and mycorrhizal networks in particular, is
included in future research in plant cognition.
Simard, S. W. (2018). Mycorrhizal Networks Facilitate Tree
Communication, Learning, and Memory. Memory and Learning in Plants.
F. Baluška, M. Gagliano and G. Witzany. Cham, Springer International
Publishing: 191-213.
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
Author: M.H.Monroe Email: admin@austhrutime.com Sources & Further reading |