![]() |
||||||||||||||
Australia: The Land Where Time Began |
||||||||||||||
Ninetyeast Ridge -
Active Faulting, Relation to Indo-Australian Plate Deformation
Broad zones of deformation in the northeast Indian Ocean are crossed by
the Ninetyeast Ridge (NER), which is about 4,500 km long, where the
Indo-Australian plate is in the process of fracturing into 3 smaller
plates (India, Capricorn, Australia) that are separated by diffuse
boundaries, though their boundaries are poorly defined. Active faults
have been imaged along the entire length of the NER by new multichannel
seismic reflection profiles which show spatial changes in deformation
style along the ridge.
Transpressional movement along WNW-ESE faults along the northern section
of the NER between 0oN and 5oN.
At the western extent of the Wharton Basin earthquake swarm that
occurred in April 2012 strike-slip was confirmed by observed patterns of
faults. Nearly N-S compression is implied by deformation on thrust
faults that are WNW-ESE-trending in the central NER, between 5oS
and 8oS. Between 8oS and 11.5oS there
is an abrupt change in fault style, with the southern NER (11oS-27oS)
being characterised by modest extension. Though extension is dominant,
narrow fault zones with strike-slip or compressional characteristics
also have been found to occur in the southern NER. Active faulting at
all sites is controlled by
the reactivation of original normal faults formed by a spreading centre,
which implies that deformation is opportunistic and focused along
existing weakness zones, even in cases where the trend of the original
fault is oblique to the direction of relative plate movement. Sager et
al. say faulting that has
been observed can be interpreted as India-Australia deformation in the
northern section of the NER, and Capricorn-Australia in the southern
part of the NER. The ridge is implied to be a tectonic boundary by the
India-Capricorn boundary being directly adjacent to the northern part of
the NER, and the combination of this juxtaposition and a different
faulting style to the east of the NER.
It has been found that the vast Indo-Australian Plate in the central
Indian Ocean is in the process of fragmenting into 3 smaller plates that
are separated by diffuse boundaries (Royer & Gordon, 1997). Many details
are still not known owing to the large extent a remote location of the
area affected, even though this location is possibly the best documented
distributed deformation within an oceanic plate. In the Central Indian
Basin to the south of India and west of the Ninetyeast Ridge (NER) there
are compressional faults and folds (Weissel et
al., 1980; Petroy & Wiens,
1989; Bull & Scrutton, 1992; Krishna et
al., 2001; Delescluse &
Chamot-Rooke, 2007). In the Wharton Basin to the east of the NER, in
contrast, deformation is mainly by strike-slip faulting (Petroy & Wiens,
1989; Stein et al., 1989;
Deplus et al. 1998; Deplus,
2001). The NER is a long volcanic ridge about 4,500 km in extent in the
middle of this deformed zone displaying active seismicity in some
locations, though the nature of this deformation is unclear as a result
of the sparseness of data in this region. Sager et
al. suggest that if the NER
is a passive weal on the oceanic lithosphere it may simply respond to
tectonic forces, which are on a broad scale, with little change to the
faulting pattern extending from adjacent basins. An alternative
suggestion has been that the NER is a mechanical boundary because of the
apparent change in deformation across it (e.g., Tinnon et
al., 1995; Delescluse &
Chamot-Rooke, 2007), therefore faulting may be complex. In this study
Sager et al. used new
multichannel seismic reflection profiles and date from multibeam
bathymetry from the NER to understand the role it plays in the
fracturing of the Indo-Australian Plate. Evidence was found of variable
style active faulting along its entire length. In this report they
document the faulting and explore implications for the location and
style of diffuse plate boundaries.
Conclusions
Active faulting has been found by seismic reflection data analysis along
the entire length of the about 4,500 km NER, though the intensity and
style vary depending on the location relative to the diffuse plate
boundaries and relative plate motion Euler poles. Recent deformation at
all sites has reactivated normal faults formed at the spreading centre.
It is implied by this finding, together with similar results from
adjacent basins, that the fracturing of the Indo-Australian Plate mainly
occurs by the reactivation faults that were formed at the time the
lithosphere was forming at the spreading centre. It has been observed
that fault direction corresponds to the original structure and not to
the pattern of regional plate motion, which indicates the most important
factor determining fault geometry is preexisting structure.
The dominant style of deformation in the northern NER, north of 1.5oN,
is transpression on faults that trend WNW-ESE. The direction of motion
on strike-slip faults that has been observed is unexpected as earlier
interpretation of earthquake focal mechanisms within the northern
section of the NER had been interpreted to support strike-slip that was
N-S, which would be consistent with the reactivation of ancient fracture
zones in the Wharton Basin which is nearby. It appears that within the
India-Australia diffuse plate boundary NW-SE compression reactivates
original spreading centre normal faults in the NER, as well as fracture
zones in the Wharton Basin along oblique Riedel shear directions.
Deformation shifts in the central NER, 6.7oS-7.7oS,
to predominantly thrust faulting, which is similar to that observed in
the Central Indian Basin, possibly with a small amount of strike-slip
motion. The India-Australia relative motion is a simpler explanation as
it agrees with the interpretations of sites to the north and south,
though the deformation could possibly be the result of either
India-Capricorn or India-Australia relative motion. Evidence of
strike-slip motion is shown by a few faults, which suggests the tress
pattern that is applied by regional plate motions has a component that
is parallel to the original faults.
Between 7.7oS and 11.3oS deformation style
abruptly changes again. Deformation in the southern section of the NER
is modest and mainly expressed as normal faulting, though interrupted by
zones of faulting that is strike-slip or compressional. At the
southernmost end of the NER extension is explained as part of a zone of
Capricorn-Australia divergence south of that Euler pole, whereas
extension is explained as part of the India-Australia boundary at 11.3oS,
as are sited further to the north. The style of faulting is not clear
but believed likely to be Capricorn-Australia convergence which is
consistent with thrust fault mechanisms that have been observed, though
in the gap between these areas low-resolution seismic data show active
faulting.
It is indicated by seismic data from the NER that there is diffuse
deformation that is widespread and often complex, sometimes having
mixtures of different types of fault, which suggests interplay of
regional stresses and structures that are preexisting. The
interpretation of Sager et al.
is that the northern NER shows India-Australia relative motion, whereas
the southern NER responds to Capricorn-Australia relative motion. That
deformation style changes can be abrupt is implied by India-Capricorn
deformation that has been documented to the western edge of the NER.
Sager et al. say this
observation is in agreement with published findings that the northern
NER is a break between deformation fields on either side. Faulting has
been found to be more complex than predicted by existing plate models,
though the observations of deformation can be understood by the
framework of larger plate motions.
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
Author: M.H.Monroe Email: admin@austhrutime.com Sources & Further reading |