![]() |
||||||||||||||
|
Australia: The Land Where Time Began |
||||||||||||||
|
Oceanic Ice Shelf Melting – the Effect of
Basal Channels
A number of ice shelves in Antarctica and Greenland have been found to
have basal channels, though it is not fully understood what their impact
is on basal melting. In the study reported in this paper Millgate et
al. used the general
circulation model from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)
to investigate the effect of basal channels on the oceanic melt rate for
an idealised ice shelf that resembles the floating tongue of the
Petermann Glacier, Greenland. The formation of a single
geostrophically
balanced boundary current is prevented by the introduction of basal
channels; the flow is instead diverted up the right-hand
(Coriolis-favoured) side of each channel, with the return flow being in
the opposite direction on the left-hand side. In agreement with previous
studies, the mean basal melt rate decreases as the prescribed number of
basal channels is increased. The subice flow was found to be a largely
geostrophic horizontal circulation for a small number of channels that
were relatively wide. The melt rate reduction is then found to be caused
by a relative contribution increase of weakly melting channels crests
and keels. The subice flow changes to a vertical overturning circulation
for a large number of channels that are relatively narrow. The result of
this change in circulation is a weaker sensitivity of melt rates to the
size of the channels. The Rossby radius of deformation governs the
transition between the 2 regimes. The important role basal channels play
in regulating basal melting is explained by the results of this study.
0.59 mm per year was contributed to sea level rise between 1992 and 2011
from the ice sheets of Antarctica and Greenland (Sheppard et
al., 2012). The acceleration
and thinning of the ice streams has been found to be the largest
contribution to this, which is believed to have resulted from oceanic
melting of their floating Ice shelves (Sheppard e
al., 2004; Holland et
al., 2998a). It is implied by
this that being able to predict the stability of the ice shelves and
gain an understanding of the ocean-ice interactions at their base is an
important step in having the ability to predict the stability of the ice
sheets of Antarctica and Greenland.
The outlet glaciers of Greenland terminate in long narrow fjords as
either a tidewater glacier, or a floating ice tongue which is less
common. There is a surface layer of Polar Water that overlies warmer
modified Atlantic Water within the fjords, and with Atlantic Water more
generally being warmer in fjords that are further south (Straneo et
al., 2012). Glaciers that
feed fjords with warmer Atlantic Water have a tendency to terminate as
tidewater glaciers without ice shelves. The retreat of the Greenland
glaciers have been linked by various studies to the warming of
subsurface waters (Holland et al.,
2008a; Nick et al., 2009;
Christoffersen et al., 2011).
In northern Greenland the Petermann Glacier is a major outlet glacier
which drains about 6 % of the area of the Greenland Ice Sheet, and is1
of 4 glaciers in Greenland that are grounded deeper than 500 m below sea
level (Falkner et al., 2011).
Petermann Glacier terminated in an ice shelf that was 70 km long until
2010 and was confined to the Petermann Fjord (Rignot & Steffen, 2008;
Johnson et al., 2011). Over
the last century the ice shelf had been relatively stable in terms of
ice volume and the extent of the ice shelf (Higgins, 1991; Falkner et
al., 2011) that was
potentially due to the modified Atlantic water layer that was cooler
than the temperatures of other fjords that were at more southerly
latitudes around Greenland (Straneo et
al., 2012). An area of
approximately 275 km2 has been removed by 2 large calving
events from the Petermann Ice Shelf since 2010, which reduced the ice
shelf to a length of about 40 km (Falkner et
al., 2011).
Around Greenland and Antarctica basal channels, channels that are carved
into the base of several ice shelves, typically those that have a strong
oceanic thermal driving, have been recorded. It has been found (Rignot &
Steffen, 2008) that the floating tongue of the Petermann Glacier has
pronounced channels that are aligned in the direction of the ice flow,
while it has been revealed (Motyka et
al., 2011) there was a large
channel in the base of Jakobshavn Isbrae ice tongue prior to its retreat
from 1998 onwards. In Antarctica channels have also been found in the
base of the Pine Island Glacier (Payne et al., 2007; Mankoff et
al., 2012; Vaughan et
al., 2012; Dutrieux et
al., 2013).
The presence of these channels has been found (Payne et
al., 2007; Mankoff et
al., 2012) to have had an
impact on the oceanography within the subice-shelf cavity, which
directed the meltwater from the inner cavity along these channels
towards the ice front. It was suggested (Payne et
al., 2997) that this would
result in enhanced melting within the channels and channel deepening.
It has been shown (Dutrieux et
al., 2013) that instead these
channels have been carved by ocean melting near the grounding line, and
then diminished downstream by melting at the keels between the channels.
It was found (Payne et al.,
2007) that the result of channelling of meltwater plumes was that enough
residual heat reached the surface of the ocean at the ice front to cause
the formation of small Polynyas. It was noted (Mankoff et
al., 2012) that basal
channels are common in ice shelves, though are prominent only in those
which undergo intense basal melting.
Several mechanisms for the formation of basal channels have been
proposed. It was found (Gladish et
al., 2012) that undulations
in the thickness of the ice at the grounding line are amplified by
oceanic melting to form longitudinal channels, whilst channels failed to
form that had a smooth (constant) thickness. It was suggested (Le Brocq
et al., 2013) that the
formation of ice shelf channels can result from subglacial water
crossing the grounding lines in a channelized manner, which would
entrain warmer ocean water, which then induced large melt rates that
were localised, which for small basal channels are enhanced by oceanic
melting. It was shown (Sergienko, 2013) that basal channels can appear
spontaneously in the presence of lateral shear, even without undulations
at the grounding line. At Petermann Glacier, however, Millgate et
al. expect the lateral shear
to be low, and it has been shown that undulations are high at the
grounding line (Rignot & Steffen, 2008).
According to Millgate et al.
the question of the overall importance of basal channels to the
stability of ice shelves remains open. It is suggested (Rignot &
Steffen, 2008) that mechanical weakness increases at the crest of
channels, where the ice is thinnest. It was shown (Vaughan et
al., 2012) that the settling
of crests and keels towards hydrostatic equilibrium is responsible for
the ice fracturing, which weakens it further.
Contrasting with this a coupled ice shelf-ocean plume model was
formulated (Gladish et al.,
2012) and found that basal channels actually increased the ice shelf
stability by preventing the development of focussed high melt rates
which melted through the ice shelf without any channels. Also, ice shelf
melting decreased monotonically as the number of smaller channels
increased. In the simple model (Gladish et
al., 2012) with reduced ocean
physics precluded an investigation of the physical mechanisms involved
in this sensitivity. In this study Millgate et
al. used the full 3D
Massachusetts Institute of Technology general circulation model (MITgcm)
to investigate further the impact basal channels have on ice-ocean
interactions and thereby the stability of the ice shelves.
Conclusion
Millgate et al. used the
MITgcm to assess the impact the basal channels have on the melting of
ice and circulation within an ice shelf cavity. It was found by Millgate
et al. that the flow of the
surface layer of the ocean beneath the ice shelf was altered by the
inclusion of the channels, which changed the focus and intensity of the
melt. They also found that as the number of channels increases there is
a decrease in the overall melt rate, which is in agreement with previous
findings (Gladish, 2012).
Millgate et al. also found
that this sensitivity is high for a small number of larger channels, but
the sensitivity drops for a greater number of smaller channels. It was
also found that a geostrophic flow circulates around the channels for
larger channels. More “no flow” regions are added beneath keels and
crests as channels are narrowed, though on the slopes the geostrophic
flow remains unchanged. The result of this is a decrease in the mean
flow of the ocean surface layer, and therefore basal melting.
Ageostrophic overturning circulation, that is much less sensitive to the
width of the channel, replaces the horizontally sheared circulation
which is not viable. The number of channels permitted before the
circulation changes from a geostrophic circulation to an overturning
circulation changes with varying viscosity changes, though at the
viscosity chosen for this study this transition is governed by the
deformation radius.
It was suggested (Dutrieux et al.,
2013) that near the grounding line melt-enhanced features rapidly reach
maximum surface expression before thinning towards the ice front. As a
result of the static nature of the ice shelf Millgate et
al. were not able to model
this directly, it is suggested, however, by their modelled results that
strong melting in the steeper section of the channel, near the grounding
line, would promote rapid growth of the channel, though a widening and
thinning of the channels would be promoted by melting further downstream
on the channel keels, which is in agreement with a previous study
(Dutrieux et al., 2013) and
the channel profiles seen in the ASTER DEM image.
The mechanical stability of the ice shelf is increased by the presence
of basal channels (Rignot & Steffen, 2008; Vaughan et
al, 2012). The susceptibility
of an ice shelf to basal melting is, however, also decreased by the
addition of channels for 2 reasons. 1. The melting is distributed more
evenly, moving away from predominantly beneath the boundary a current
which is Coriolis-generated to over more of the ice shelf. 2. There is a
decrease in the mean melt rate. A possible explanation as to why basal
channels are observed in warm-water ice shelves in Greenland and
Antarctica is this stabilising effect. Ice shelves with channels are
more likely to persist, and a “survivor bias” then makes them more
likely to be observed, if the channels stabilise ice shelves.
There are limitations to the model that was used in this study. There is
a requirement for coupled models with an evolving ice shelf to test the
full impact of the physical processes described in this paper. It is
shown by observational data that there is a shallow sill that separates
a deep basin within Petermann Fjord from Hall Basin (Johnson et
al., 2011), though the
bathymetry beneath Petermann Glacier is not known. The profile of the
channels is also highly idealised, so Millgate et
al. plan to model a realistic
Petermann Ice Shelf domain with a more realistic bathymetry.
The use of a higher resolution model would allow modelling
current subgrid scale processes and reduce the amount of
parameterisation. Millgate et al.
also say the model is limited by the lack of seasonal forcings, tides
and winds which will be included in further model studies.
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
| Author: M.H.Monroe Email: admin@austhrutime.com Sources & Further reading | ||||||||||||||