![]() |
||||||||||||||
|
Australia: The Land Where Time Began |
||||||||||||||
|
Primordial Black Holes – Observational Characteristics of the
Final Evaporation
The formation of Primordial Black Holes (PBHs) is predicted in many
theories of the early universe. According to Ukwatta et
al. PBHs could have masses
that range from the Planck mass, mp = 2.18 x 10-8
kg to 105 solar masses or higher depending on the size of the
universe at its formation. A Black Hole (BH) has a Hawking temperature
which is proportional to its mass. Therefore a black hole that is
sufficiently small will radiate quasi-thermally particles at a rate that
is ever increasing as emission reduces its mass and raises its
temperature. According to Ukwatta et
al., the final moments of
this evaporation should be explosive, and the description of it is
dependent on the particle physics model. This paper presents the results
of the study by Ukwatta et al.
investigating the final few seconds of this evaporation phase of a black
hole, using the Standard Model and incorporating the most recent results
obtained from the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), and provides a new
parameterisation for the instantaneous emission spectrum. Ukwatta et
al. calculate for the first
time primordial black hole burst light curves in the GeV/TeV energy
range that are energy dependent. They also explored the primordial black
hole burst search methods and potential observational signals of
primordial black holes. As a result of this study they have found a
unique signature in the PBH burst light curves that may be detectable by
GeV/TeV gamma ray (γ-ray) observatories such as the High Altitude Water
Cerenkov (HAWC) observatory. Ukwatta et
al. also discuss the
implications of theories beyond the Standard Model on the PBH burst
observational characteristics, including potential sensitivity of the
instantaneous photon detection rate to a squark threshold in the 5-10
TeV range.
The production of PBHs is predicted by many current theories of the
early universe (Carr et al.,
2010). PBHs with masses in the order of, or smaller than, the size of
the cosmological horizon at the time of formation could have been formed
by cosmological density fluctuations, as well as other mechanisms, such
as those associated with phase transitions in the early universe. PBHs
could form at times from the Planck time to 1 second or later after the
Big Bang, depending on the mechanism of formation. Therefore the initial
mass of the PBH could be as small as the Planck mass or as massive as 105
solar masses, or even higher.
It was shown in 1974 by Hawking that convolving quantum field theory,
thermodynamics and general relativity that a black hole has a
temperature that is inversely proportional to its mass and emits
particle and photon radiation with thermal spectra (Hawking, 1974). The
mass of the black hole decreases as this radiation is emitted leading to
increases in the temperature and flux of the black hole. A primordial
black hole that had an initial mass of ~ 5.0 x 1011 kg when
it formed in the early universe should, according to Ukwatta et
al., be expiring at the
present (MacGibbon, Carr & Page, 2008) with a burst of high energy
particles, including gamma-rays in the MeV to TeV energy range.
Therefore PBHs are candidates for gamma-ray burst (GRB) progenitors
(Halzen, Zas, MacGibbon & Weekes, 1991).
Valuable insight into many areas of physics including the early
universe, high energy particle physics, and the convolution of
gravitation with thermodynamics, would be provided by confirmed
detection of a PBH evaporation event. Conversely, important limits would
be placed on models of the early universe by the non-detection of PBH
evaporation events in sky searches. The constraining of the cosmological
density fluctuation spectrum in the early universe on scales that are
smaller than those that are constrained by the cosmic microwave
background is one of the most important reasons to search for PBHs.
Ukwatta et al. say there is
particular interest in whether PBHs form from the quantum fluctuations
that are associated with many different types of inflationary scenarios
(Carr, Kohri, Sendouda & Yokoyama, 2010). Inflationary models can
therefore be formed by the detection of upper limits on the number
density of PBHs.
Ukwatta et al. suggest PBHs
may be detectable by virtue of several effects. E.g., PBHs that have
masses that are of planetary scale may be detectable by their
gravitational effects in microlensing observations (Griest et al.,
2011); or distinct, observable radiation may be produced by the
accretion of matter onto PBHs in relatively dense environments
(Trofimenko, 1990). It has been suggested, however, that such
environments should be rare and therefore difficult to use as probes of
the cosmological or local distributions of PBHs.
The properties of the final burst of a black hole depend on the physics
that govern the production and decay of high-energy particles. The
temperature of a black hole increases as the black hole evaporates and
loses mass over its lifetime. The higher the number of fundamental
degrees of freedom, the faster and more powerful the final burst from
the black hole will be. The details of the spectra that have been
predicted differ according to the high-energy particle physics model. In
the Standard Evaporation Model (SEM) incorporating the Standard Model of
particle physics, a black hole should directly Hawking-radiate the
fundamental Standard Model particles which have de Broglie wavelengths
that are of the order of the size of the black hole (MacGibbon & Webber,
1990). Once the radiation energy approaches the Quantum Chromodynamics
(QCD) confinement scale (~ 200-300 MeV), quarks and gluons will be
directly emitted (MacGibbon & Webber, 1990). The quarks and gluons
should fragment and hadronise (analogous to jets observed in high-energy
collisions in terrestrial accelerators) into particles stable on
astrophysical timescales (MacGibbon, Carr & Page, 2008) as they stream
away from the black hole. In the SEM therefore, the black hole that is
evaporating is an astronomical burst of photons, neutrons, electrons,
positrons, protons and anti-protons (and for sources that are close
enough, neutrons and anti-neutrons (Smith et al., 2013; Keivani et al.,
2015).
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
| Author: M.H.Monroe Email: admin@austhrutime.com Sources & Further reading | ||||||||||||||