![]() |
||||||||||||||
|
Australia: The Land Where Time Began |
||||||||||||||
|
Early Settlement in Central Australia and Cultural Innovation
and Megafauna Interaction
In order to understand the adaptability of populations and the potential
causes of the extinction of the megafauna 50-40 ka it is essential to
elucidate the material culture of the early inhabitants of arid
Australia and the nature of their environmental interactions. By 50 ka
the continent had been colonised by ancestral Aboriginal people (Veth &
O’Connor, 2013; Allen & O’Connell, 2014), though it had been believed
that compared to early people in Europe and Africa an apparent lack of
cultural innovations had been a barrier to early settlement of the
extensive arid zone (Allen & O’Connell, 2014; Mellars, 2006). In this
paper evidence is presented that was uncovered from
Warratyi rockshelter in the
southern interior that indicates that humans had occupied the arid
regions of Australia by around 49 ka, which is 10,000 years earlier that
had been reported previously (Allen & O’Connell, 2014). The only known
reliably dated stratified evidence of extinct Australian megafauna
(Roberts et al., 2001; Grellet-Tinner, Spooner & Worthy, 2016) has been
preserved at this site, which includes the giant marsupial
Diprotodon optatum,
alongside artefacts more than 46,000 old. Also reported are the
earliest-known use of ochre in Australia and Southeast Asia (at or prior
to 49-46 ka), gypsum pigment (40-33 ka), bone tools (40-38 ka), hafted
tools (38-35 ka, and backed artefacts (30-24 ka), all of which are up to
10 kyr older than any other known occurrence (Attenbrow, Robertson &
Hiscock, 2009; Habgood & Franklin, 2008). It is therefore shown by the
evidence presented in this by Hamm et
al. that as well as settling
the interior an unexpectedly short time after arriving in northern
Australia, they had also developed technologies much earlier than had
previously been recorded for Australia and Southeast Asia (Habgood &
Franklin, 2008).
Previously, 10 archaeological sites dating to between 41 ka and 28 ka
had been recorded from the arid regions of Australia (Smith, 2013). Many
of these sites lack deposits that are well-stratified and very few span
a period of more than 20 kyr. Across the continent the scarcity of sites
dating to the Late Pleistocene, especially in the southern arid
interior, has continued to prevent reliable interpretations of the
nature, timing and implications of human colonisation. Important new
evidence for the settlement of arid Australia early in the occupation of
the continent by Aboriginal people is provided by deposits at Warratyi
rockshelter. The site is an elevated rockshelter in the country of the
Adnyamathanha people that is within the present arid zone at the
northern end of the Flinders Ranges, southern Lake Eyre Basin, South
Australia. Contained in the site is a stratified intact archaeological
deposit that is 1 m deep, and is composed of 4 stratigraphic units
(SU1-SU4).
The occupation chronology was established by single-grain optical dating
(optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) and thermally-transferred OSL
(TT-OSL)) of quartz grains and radiocarbon (14C) dating of
charcoal from a hearth and avian eggshells. Calibrated radiocarbon ages
of deposition of more than 46 ka and more than 44.7 ka (mean calibrated
ages ± 68 % probability ranges = 48.2 ± 1.2 ka and 47.3 ± 1.5 ka) based
on an eggshell of a large extinct megapode bird (Grellet-Tinner, Spooner
& Worthy, 2016) (see supplementary information: megafauna), and a
calibrated radiocarbon age of 49.2-46.3 ka, based on emu eggshell. All
are within 2 standard errors of 2 associated optical ages 43.8 ± 3.4 ka
and 42.8 ± 2.4 ka. There are 5 radiocarbon ages with a combined span of
41.0-32.7 ka that constrain the age of the overlying SU3, as well as
optical ages of 40.5 ± 2.2 ka and 30.3 ± 1.6 ka. The deposition of SU2
is constrained by Bayesian modelling of 1 optical age and 4 radio carbon
ages to between 29.8-24.4 ka, while SU1B was revealed by 3 optical ages
to have accumulated 11.8-9.9 ka, with younger eggshells being
incorporated into this unit by bioturbation. Based on this ages Warratyi
rockshelter is shown to be the only site outside tropical northern
Australia to have a rich, stratified record of repeated human activity
that spanned 50-10 ka.
Stone artefacts were recovered from throughout this deposit with
concentrations being present at depths of 5-20 cm (corresponding to
SU1-upper part SU2) and 60-80 cm (SU3). The composition of the lithic
assemblage is mostly of whole flakes, broken flakes and waste material.
A range of raw materials were used in the manufacture of stone
artefacts, which reflects a change in rock types that were preferred
over time. Changes in tool types also reflect this pattern; in the upper
parts of SU2 and in SU1, chert and silcrete become major components.
Changes in tool types was also reflected in this pattern; SU1
and SU2 contained predominantly
backed and small hafted tools, while SU3 and SU4 contained whole and
retouched flakes. The antiquity of backed and hafted tools in Australia
is greatly extended by the chronology that has been revealed by Bayesian
modelling of all stratigraphically reliable ages that were available for
Warratyi. In SU2 3 geometric microliths that were found at a depth of 25
cm, are the oldest backed artefacts, based on Bayesian modelled
deposition ages of 30-24 ka. Prior to the finds at Warratyi the oldest
confirmed ages of deposition were 4 ka in the arid zone (Smith, 2013)
and 8.5 ka on the east coast (Attenbrow, Robertson & Hiscock, 2009).
There was a possible occurrence at the GRE8 rockshelter site in the
Carpentarian Gorges of northern Queensland that was dated to 15 ka, but
the interpretation of its stratigraphy has been questioned (Smith, 2013;
Slack et al., 2004). Resin within SU3 (70-75 cm depth) was identified by
residue analysis which has shown that some flakes had been hafted (see
Extended Data Fig. 8A and Supplementary Information: residues in
source). A deposition age of 40-33 ka for SU3 unit, which was produced
by the modelling, carried out by Hamm et
al.1, which has
shown that this is the earliest-known evidence by far of hafting
technology in Australia and Southeast Asia. Previously the oldest ages
were from the Early Holocene at 10-9 ka (Mulvaney & Kamminga, 1999;
Barton et al., 2009).
At depths of 20-75 cm in SU2-SU3
(40-24 ka) white spheroids were found which have diameters of 2-30 mm.
The material in the spheres was identified by X-ray diffraction analysis
as gypsum (see Extended Data Fig. 8B and Supplementary Information:
gypsum), the closest known source of which is 12-15 km to the north.
This gypsiferous material was interpreted as having been brought back to
the rockshelter to make white pigment. Red ochre was also confirmed to
be present by X-ray analysis, and the deepest sample was found in SU4
associated with artefacts and bone material dating to ≥49-46 ka (see
Extended Data Fig. 2 and Supplementary Information: red ochre). The
presence of red ochre that had been worked was confirmed by residue
analysis on a silcrete stone tool in SU4 at 90 cm depth (see
Supplementary Information: residues). Carpenters Gap Rockshelter is the
site of the finding of the previous earliest evidence of the use of
ochre in Australia and Southeast Asia which dated to 42.8 ka (O’Connor &
Franklin, 2001; Aubert et al., 2014). Archaeological evidence for the
pre-modern use of gypsum has not been reported to date in Australia.
In a representative sub-sample of the Warratyi bone assemblage there
were at least 16 mammal species and 1 species of reptile (see
Supplementary Information: fauna). Among the 2,000 fragments that were
assessed there was a predominance of medium-sized macropodids. No
evidence of the bones being gnawed or breakage patterns that are caused
by the teeth of scavengers was found, which supports the interpretation
of the bones being a result of human activity. A sharpened bone point
was recovered from a depth of 65-70 cm, SU3, which had been ground from
the cylindrical portion of the proximal end of the fibula of a
macropodid, which was similar to a yellow-footed rock wallaby,
Petrogale xanthopus.
Elsewhere, single-point tools have been interpreted as being used for
fine needle of awl work on animal skins (Webb & Allen, 1990). Bone tools
have been considered to be an innovation from the Late Pleistocene by
humans in Australia and East Timor, though they only appeared in the
last 11 ky in the remainder of Southeast Asia (O’Conner, Robertson &
Aplin, 2014; Rabett, 2005). It is indicated by the stratigraphic
position of this tool that has a date of more than 38 kyr, substantially
earlier than the next youngest examples that were recovered from Warreen
Cave in Tasmania that dated to 29 ka (Cosgrove, 1999) and Devils Lair in
southwestern Australia that dated to 26 ka.
A partial right juvenile radius of
Diprotodon optatum and
possibly burnt and unburnt fragments of eggshell of a large
ground-nesting bird, and the shell type has been identified as
Genyornis newtoni
were recovered from 85-90 cm depth (see Extended Data Figs. 9,10).
Deposition age of ≥49-46 ka has been found by direct radiocarbon dating
of shell and optical dating of host sediments. The co-occurrence of
these taxa with humans who were probably involved in the accumulation of
their remains is indicated by the age of these fossils, as well as no
evidence of tooth marks made by carnivores and the location of the
shelter on a steep escarpment that is not suitable for
D. optatum individuals to
climb (see Supplementary Information: stratigraphy).
Warratyi Rockshelter has been found to be the earliest known occupation
site in the arid zone of Australia and one of the earliest known on the
entire continent. It is suggested by the presence of people in the
southern interior of the continent at or before 49-46 ka that the first
arrivals must have spread more rapidly across the continent than
previously believed. Hamm et al.
suggest a more direct route from north to south may have been taken by
the first settlers instead of exclusively along the coast. Hamm et
al. say the evidence supports
the model that Aboriginal people settled the arid zone long before the
conditions in the arid zone became extremely arid during the
Last
Glacial Maximum, and the associated expansion of major environmental
barriers such as sandy deserts (Hiscock & Wallis, 2005).
It is indicated by the repeated, ephemeral occupation of the site that
the Aboriginal people may have used Warratyi as a refuge at a time when
the lowlands and plains that surround the site were so arid that they
couldn’t be exploited and as a temporary camp site when environmental
conditions improved and became more stable regionally (Smith, 2013).
It is shown by such things as worked bone technology that had been
developed by at least 40-38 ka, and by at least 35 ka hafted tools, and
backed artefacts by at least by 24 ka that the people at Warratyi were
early innovators of modern technological adaptations that have been
found in the Late Pleistocene of Australia and Southeast Asia. Hamm et
al. suggest this refutes
views that were previously held concerning the timing of cultural and
technological innovation in Late Pleistocene Australia.
Stratified archaeological data and chronology is also provided by
Warratyi the link directly humans to megafauna in Australia. The
extinction of large vertebrates from the continents marks the Late
Pleistocene (Barnosky et al., 2008; Field et
al., 2013; Wroe et
al., 2013). In Australia and
New Guinea there at least 22 species that overlapped temporarily with
humans, but went extinct later (Barnosky et
al., 2008), though there are
only 2 sites, Cuddie Springs in eastern Australia and Nombe rockshelter
in New Guinea, that have been reported to have contained cultural and
megafauna materials within the same stratigraphic layers (Barnosky et
al., 2008; Wroe et al.,
2013). Evidence of direct association between megafauna and humans at
these sites have, however, been challenged based on formation of the
site, climatic, stratigraphic and chronological grounds (Brook et
al., 2013; Cohen et
al., 2015; Grün et
al., 2010).
Hamm et al. suggest that the
discovery of bones of megafauna and directly dated eggshell in Warratyi
that was well-stratified and that has been dated reliably in an
archaeological context shows that these taxa were contemporary with
humans, and also provides the only direct evidence of humans interacting
with some megafauna in Australia. It is also important that Warratyi is
located in northern South Australia for the valuation of causes of
megafauna extinction over the entire continent, as it confirms the
temporal overlap of humans and extinct species between 50 ka and 40 ka
across a much broader geographic area of Australia than was previously
believed. Direct evidence for the co-existence of humans and megafauna
for the arid interior, a major region of the continent, had been lacking
until now.
It is rare in Australia and southern Asia to find an archaeological site
to contain evidence of modern human colonisation, unique cultural
innovation and interaction with species of megafauna that are now
extinct. It is rarer still to find sites that preserve records of human
occupation going back 50 ka. Warratyi rockshelter, as well as these
landmark discoveries, reveals evidence of the development of modern
human behaviour in Australia and Asia. A dynamic, adaptive culture
existed in arid Australia within as little as a few thousand years of
settlement of the continent, are revealed by important technological
innovations and early symbolic behaviour (Hiscock & Wallis, 2005; Balme
et al., 2009).
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
| Author: M.H.Monroe Email: admin@austhrutime.com Sources & Further reading | ||||||||||||||