![]() |
||||||||||||||
|
Australia: The Land Where Time Began |
||||||||||||||
|
WLH 50 Description of and Comparison with Ngandong Samples
Condition and Preservation
The WLH 50 vault that was reconstructed by Thorne is comprised of a
calotte with no face and most of the base is missing. As the vault has
not been completely preserved Wolpoff et
al. limited their
observations, comparisons and measurements to the aspects if WLH 50 that
could ascertained directly. Though this might seem obvious, they wanted
to make clear that this is the
only factor which delimited the information they presented (11).
For the most part the bone that remains is well preserved, though there
are many portions of the outer bone table that are abraded (Curnoe,
2011, see Figure 5 & text), as well as other exceptions that are noted
below. Bone surface extends continuously, with a few exceptions gaps
that have been filled by red wax, from the frontal, which includes most
of the full supraorbital torus, a description of which is below. A piece
of the orbital roof, 22 mm x by 31.5 mm, length x breadth, is preserved
adjacent to the lateral torus on the left side. The external bone
surface is mostly complete from a position at or very close (14) to the
glabella on the medial-most part of the right side of the supraorbital
torus, posteriorly to the upper part of the nuchal plane of the
occipital, 6 mm beyond (anterior and inferior to) the
tuberculum linearum on the
superior nuchal line. In this document the
tuberculum linearum is
defined as the union of the superior nuchal lines and the midline, where
they meet the external nuchal crest.
The supraorbital crest extends laterally on both sides to a position
that is not quite as lateral as the fontozygomatic suture. But,
posterior to this, nothing has been preserved of the orbital notch with
the exception of just below the temporal ridge. Behind the supraorbital,
the left (more complete side) preserves a broken inferior edge that
arches in parallel to the temporal ridge up to the position of the
coronal suture, and then continues the arch posteriorly and inferiorly
to a position 14 mm anterior to the parietal notch (at the parietal
mastoid angle).
The posterior portion of the temporal remains on the left side but
without any of its petrous region or the root of the zygomatic arch; the
posterior portion of the supramastoid crest is preserved on the right.
The bone surface is preserved 26.5 mm anterior to the front edge of the
mastoid; this is the most lateral aspect of the roof (the
tegmen of Weidenreich) above
the external auditory meatus or any part of the tympanic. Most of the
mastoid process remains on the left side, including its anterior and
posterior edges, though it is not evident that the tip remains.
Posterior to this, the broken surface of the bone is an irregular arch
across the nuchal plane of the occipital, and the inferior nuchal line
is not preserved anywhere, and with its most posterior extent just
anterior to the tuberculum
linearum, as described above. The surface of the bone is clearly
eroded across the cranial posterior, especially inferior to the supreme
nuchal line. This means that effectively an unknown amount of outer bone
table has been lost from the nuchal torus and with it the crania’s
posterior projection. The bone thickness measurements that are affected
have not been reported. The positions of the
tuberculum linearum and the
inion can be approximated easily from the anatomy that remains. As
defined here the inion is superior to it, the midline point marked by a
chord between the superior nuchal lines and in their most superior
position (lateral to be beginning of the downward arc where they dip
down to form the tuberculum
linearum. At the inion and
tuberculum linearum positions bone thicknesses are not certain
because of the erosion of the bone, but According to Wolpoff et
al. they are confident that
the linear or arc measurements to these points on the external surface
are close to their original values. The top of the torus, effectively
the supreme nuchal line, does appear to be preserved without significant
erosion, though difficult to identify on photographs.
Opisthocranion occurs on the
supreme nuchal line and measurements to it are also correct. The
internal occipital protuberance is coincident with the supreme line and
Wolpoff et al. say they are
confident of the thickness of the occipital at this position as well.
The inferior-most edge of cranium is less complete on the right side,
from the position of the mastoid base anteriorly. A small portion of the
posterior temporal squama extends 34.5 mm anterior to the parietal
notch, and 20 mm superior to it. The posterior parietal here is not well
preserved, with an irregular break that more or less parallels the
lambdoidal suture for 62 mm, about 30 mm anterior to it. From its most
superior extent the break is a jagged, zigzagging surface that continues
anteriorly to the most lateral extent that is preserved to the right
supraorbital surface, which is described as follows. The broken edge
continues 63 mm anterosuperiorly, to a point in the middle of the
parietal that almost reaches the sagittal suture.
The broken surface then continues some 60 mm inferiorly,
irregularly for 34 mm anterosuperiorly to the position of the temporal
line, and 88 mm inferoanteriorly until it reaches the most lateral
surface of the right supraorbital, as described above.
The internal surface of the vault is preserved in a corresponding
manner. Its internal table is not complete on the preserved portion of
the left temporal, and especially behind the supraorbital torus where 20
mm of the left-most lateral portion of the orbital roof remains,
extending 30 mm to the supraorbital notch. The anterior surface of what
appears to have been a frontal sinus is exposed for 32.5 mm, to the
midline. It is noted by Webb (Webb, 1989: p. 35):
“the size of the left sinus is estimated to have been about 6.8 cm3.
This is based on the following dimensions: 22 mm deep
(anterioposteriorly), 28 mm wide and about 11 mm high. The form and size
of frontal pneumatisation in WLH 50 corresponds more closely to that of
the Ngandong crania … than it does with the small Zhoukoudian sample.”
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
| Author: M.H.Monroe Email: admin@austhrutime.com Sources & Further reading | ||||||||||||||